Microsoft EA Renewal Pitfalls: Hidden Costs and Terms You Might Miss
Executive Summary: Renewing a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement can be a minefield if you’re unaware of hidden clauses and cost traps.
Many enterprises overlook “evergreen” renewals, volume tier changes, or vague usage terms that inflate costs or lock them in unexpectedly.
This guide highlights common pitfalls, including auto-renewing subscriptions, pricing tier lock-ins, and ambiguous licensing definitions, and contrasts the EA with CSP options.
Organizations can avoid unpleasant surprises and negotiate a clean, cost-effective renewal by understanding these hidden terms and planning carefully (including evaluating CSP vs EA).
Read about Microsoft EA Renewal Strategies.
The Renewal Blind Spot
Renewal time is when your Microsoft EA’s fine print comes into play.
Too often, companies treat an EA renewal as a simple repeat purchase, but it’s an opportunity—and a risk point.
Hidden costs can emerge if you haven’t kept an eye on the details:
- Surprise True-Up Bills: If your user count or usage grew during the last term and you didn’t proactively address it, the true-up at renewal could be a shock. For instance, adding Azure services or extra Microsoft 365 users mid-term accrues charges. At renewal, Microsoft will charge for that increased usage for the past year if it has not already been paid. Many teams get caught off guard by a six or seven-figure true-up bill right when they’re also trying to negotiate the new EA.
- Unquestioned Auto-Renewals: Certain aspects of your Microsoft environment may continue automatically if not terminated actively. While the EA doesn’t auto-renew by default (you must sign a new agreement), certain subscriptions or services under it might roll over. Also, if you transitioned some licenses to cloud subscriptions, those often auto-renew annually. A lapse in attention could mean you continue paying for a service you intended to drop.
- Last-Minute Scramble: A common pitfall is starting renewal discussions too late. Microsoft’s tactics and any complex internal approvals mean you’ll miss chances to optimize if you’re rushed. In haste, companies may accept boilerplate terms or overlook usage rights details that later prove costly. Failing to treat renewal as a project can create a blind spot where hidden costs lurk.
The key message: treat EA renewal as a major contract negotiation, not a simple administrative update. Shine a light on every corner of the contract well in advance so nothing is hidden when you sign on the dotted line.
Evergreen Clauses and Auto-Renewal Traps
One potentially sneaky aspect in the licensing world is the concept of “evergreen” contracts that renew automatically unless notice is given.
While a standard Microsoft EA has a fixed 3-year term, there are related elements to watch:
- Cloud Subscription Evergreenness: The contract is evergreen under the newer Microsoft Customer Agreement (which underpins CSP programs). If you move some workloads to CSP as part of a renewal strategy, remember that CSP subscriptions auto-renew by default (monthly or annually). This is convenient, but also dangerous if you intend to scale down or switch providers – you must actively cancel or reduce your service before the renewal date, or you’ll continue to be billed. In an EA context, if you shift some services to Azure Plan or CSP licensing at the end of the EA, track those renewal dates meticulously. Missing an annual cancellation window means you’re on the hook for another year.
- Notification Deadlines: Some EA contracts include clauses requiring you to notify Microsoft or your reseller of non-renewal or reductions. For example, a custom term might require you to declare your intent not to renew a service 30 days before expiration. If such clauses exist and are overlooked, you may inadvertently agree to renewal or lose the opportunity to reduce quantities. Always scour your current EA for any “evergreen” or notice clauses if you find any, set calendar reminders well in advance.
- Evergreen Support Agreements: If you have Microsoft Unified Support attached to your EA, note that support contracts often auto-renew. Microsoft’s support (formerly Premier/Unified Support) can be tied to EA, but it has its own terms. Those support fees may increase annually and auto-renew unless renegotiated. This is a hidden cost if procurement isn’t aware that it needs to renegotiate support separate from the EA licenses.
In summary, “evergreen” in the Microsoft licensing realm usually applies more to CSP/MCA subscriptions and support agreements than to the EA itself.
However, as you transition products or add-ons out of the EA structure, ensure that nothing continues without scrutiny.
To avoid automatic renewals, have a renewal checklist that includes all ancillary contracts, and explicitly confirm any cancellations or changes in writing with Microsoft or the partner.
Read Microsoft EA Spend Justification and Renewal Pitfalls for Enterprise IT Leaders.
Volume Tier Lock-Ins and Price Reset Shocks
Enterprise Agreements offer tiered discounts, but those tiers can be a double-edged sword at renewal time:
- Dropping Below a Discount Threshold: Microsoft offers volume pricing levels (often designated as A, B, C, or D) based on the number of licenses or an enterprise-wide commitment. For instance, an organization with 5,000 users might be Level C, and 10,000+ users is Level D (with the best discounts). If your company is downsizing or plans to reduce licenses at renewal, be prepared for a price increase per license. You might fall to a lower tier. This is a lock-in effect: the initial deal gave you a great unit price for a high quantity, but the unit price will jump if you can’t maintain that quantity. Always model your per-user or per-device cost if you renew with fewer licenses. Sometimes the difference between tiers can be 5-15% in unit pricing – enough to offset the savings you expected from cutting unused licenses.
- Price Protection Expiry: During the EA term, you enjoyed fixed prices. At renewal, that protection will be removed, and Microsoft will reset pricing to the then-current list prices (minus any negotiated discount). Many customers don’t realize how much list prices may have risen. For example, if Office 365 E3 was $20 and went to $24 over three years, your renewal quote will be based on the $24 list (even if you had it at $20 locked in). This “sticker shock” is a common phenomenon. To avoid it, watch Microsoft’s public announcements of price changes. It might be wise to negotiate price increase caps or extended price holds during your renewal (though Microsoft often resists this, large customers sometimes get a cap on year-over-year increases as a special term).
- Locked Into Unneeded Capacity: Another pitfall is not reducing what you’re entitled to when you can. If you bought for 1,000 users and you still have 800 users, you should trim down at renewal. However, Microsoft’s renewal quotes often simply copy your last known quantities. If you don’t actively push for a reduction, you might sign up for another term with the same numbers, effectively paying 200 extra licenses for three more years. Don’t let inertia lock you in – take advantage of renewal to right-size. It may involve uncomfortable conversations (Microsoft and even internal departments might resist losing those extra licenses), but the cost savings are worth it.
To manage these issues, enter renewal negotiations with a clear understanding of your future needs. If you anticipate growth, try to lock in pricing for that (or at least ensure that the higher-tier discounts remain if you add later).
If you anticipate reductions, prepare arguments for why Microsoft should allow you to retain a better discount tier even if the count drops (e.g., a long-term partnership or commitment to other products).
At minimum, avoid surprises by calculating the new unit prices beforehand so you’re ready to address them.
Vague Usage Definitions and Compliance Risks
Microsoft licensing agreements include pages of definitions—what constitutes a “User” and a “Device”, how “usage” is counted, etc.
If you skim over these, you might mis-license your environment or incur unexpected costs:
- Qualified User/Device Definition: An “Enterprise Products” must generally be purchased for all Qualified users or devices in an E. The definition of a qualified user or device is critical – it often means any user or device that accesses the software or cloud service. If, for example, you have part-time staff or contractors that use your Microsoft 365 environment, they likely count as qualified users even if they aren’t full-time employees. Companies sometimes mistakenly omit certain groups (e.g., “we didn’t license interns or contractors”). At true-up or audit, Microsoft may require back-payment for those unlicensed users. The term is vague to a layperson, but legally binding – ensure you have counted every required head/unit. When renewing, update the count if you previously got it wrong.
- Multiplexing and Indirect Use: These terms in product use rights mean that even if a user is not directly logged into a Microsoft system, if they receive information or services indirectly from it, they might still need a license. A hidden pitfall is that if you have non-human-operated processes or an external portal accessing a Dynamics or SQL database, you may need additional licenses (such as an external connector or sufficient CALs). You may be out of compliance if you haven’t clarified these definitions. At renewal, Microsoft may push new licenses to address the issue. It’s better to proactively address any gray areas: ask, “Do we fully understand Microsoft’s definition of usage for each product? Any potential compliance gaps?” and resolve them in the renewal (possibly negotiating some free licenses or exceptions if needed).
- “Active User” vs. Assigned License Ambiguity: Microsoft sometimes distinguishes between assigned licenses and active usage in cloud services metrics, but billing is typically based on assigned licenses. If a term like active usage appears, don’t assume you only pay for active users – you pay for all assigned licenses regardless of use. Some organizations have misunderstood preview offers or reports and thought they would be charged based on actual usage patterns. Clarify that in an EA renewal: e.g., if you have 100 Power BI Pro licenses assigned but only 50 active users monthly, you’re still paying for 100. The pitfall is thinking unused licenses don’t cost anything – they do, unless you remove them.
- Geo or Affiliate Scope: If your contract language is vague about which affiliated companies or geographies are included, you might either overspend or accidentally be unlicensed in some area. Microsoft EAs often cover a defined entity or “Enterprise”. If your company has grown or undergone restructuring, update the contract to list all entities that require coverage. If you don’t, you might miss out on counting some users (compliance issue) or, conversely, you might be forced to license a subsidiary you sold off (if you don’t remove them). The hidden cost could be licensing people who no longer work for the enterprise due to M&A changes, just because the contract wasn’t updated.
In short, don’t let the fine print stay fine. Bring those definitions to a meeting with your legal or SAM experts and parse them. Ask Microsoft to clarify any unclear points in the writing.
It’s much better to negotiate a clear contract than to sign a vague one and fight over interpretations later (which usually won’t go in your favor).
Clearing up definitions may not feel urgent during a busy renewal, but it can prevent massive compliance penalties or extra purchases.
EA vs CSP: Renewal Time Switch or Stay?
A growing consideration for renewal is whether to sign another EA or transition to the Cloud Solution Provider model.
Microsoft has been nudging some customers in this direction since 2025; some mid-sized customers were informed that the traditional EA might not be available for purely cloud-based services.
Here’s how the two compare in the renewal context:
- Commitment vs Flexibility: Renewing an EA means another 3-year commitment to core products. If you opt for CSP, you have no long-term contract – it’s an evergreen service with annual or monthly subscriptions. The pitfall for EA is over-commitment; for CSP, the pitfall is that you might lose discipline in managing subscriptions (and potentially pay for auto-renewed services you forget to turn off). Organizations that experience fluctuating size or uncertain outlook might lean toward CSP to avoid being locked in. However, remember that CSP flexibility requires you to actively manage it, or costs will creep up via renewals you didn’t plan for (as mentioned earlier).
- Pricing Differences: At renewal, an EA negotiation might secure, for example, a 20% discount off the list price. In CSP, you typically pay close to list price (partners may give a small 5% discount or add value in other ways). If you switch to CSP, your per-user costs may rise unless you significantly downsize. The hidden cost here is the loss of economies of scale. Conversely, a hidden cost of sticking with EA could be overbuying to reach a discount tier – sometimes companies purchase extra licenses they might not immediately need, just to hit a higher discount level, hoping future growth will utilize them. That strategy can backfire if growth doesn’t materialize, leaving you with shelfware.
- Operational Overhead: With an EA, you have the simplicity of one renewal every three years, along with an annual true-up. CSP is a continuous management process, potentially involving many small renewals or adjustments. Some enterprises underestimate the administrative effort needed to track and optimize an evergreen model with many subscriptions (CSP). If you don’t invest in effective license management, CSPs’ flexibility can lead to a proliferation of subscriptions and inadvertent spending (e.g., forgetting to remove licenses after a project concludes). So, weigh if your ITAM/SAM processes are mature enough.
- Scenario – Partial CSP Shift: Not All-or-Nothing: A strategy could be to renew a “light” EA (perhaps core Microsoft 365 licenses) but move more variable services (such as Azure or certain add-ons) to CSP. This hybrid approach can mitigate pitfalls – you lock in pricing for stable needs and keep flexibility for the rest. Just be mindful of the complexity: you must manage two models and ensure you’re not double-paying or missing benefits by splitting contracts. The hidden cost could be losing a significant bundle discount (Microsoft often offers better pricing when more products are included in the EA).
Comparison: Key differences between renewing under an EA versus switching to CSP. The graphic highlights that an EA provides a fixed term with volume discounts and centralized negotiation, whereas CSP offers an evergreen subscription model with flexibility but at standard pricing. Understanding these trade-offs helps you choose the right renewal path.
Microsoft, for its part, is increasingly pushing cloud subscriptions and CSP for certain segments, because it smooths their revenue.
As noted in some 2024–2025 announcements, some smaller EAs will no longer be offered; those customers must transition to CSP.
A potential pitfall is assuming you can renew your EA; double-check with Microsoft to confirm if your profile qualifies for an EA or if they intend to transition you to a Microsoft Customer Agreement model. If so, negotiate the transition carefully – ensure you don’t lose pricing protections or other perks.
Hidden Azure and Cloud Costs at Renewal
Many EAs now include Azure consumption (through an Azure Monetary Commitment or an Azure Plan enrollment).
There are specific pitfalls here:
- Unused Azure Commit Funds: If you committed to spend a certain amount on Azure over the EA term (say $1M/year) but only used $800k, you generally don’t get a refund – use it or lose it. At renewal, any under-consumed commitment is a sunk cost. The lesson is to set realistic commitments. The hidden cost was overcommitting. Conversely, if you overshot and used more, you paid overage at a lower discounted rate. When renewing, analyze your Azure usage trajectory. It might be better to shift Azure to a pay-as-you-go or CSP model if you want flexibility. Alternatively, if you do recommit, use the past term’s data to right-size it. Don’t let Microsoft repeat your old commit number if your cloud strategy changes.
- Azure Discount Changes: Microsoft’s incentives on Azure in EA vs CSP can differ. Perhaps you had a special discount on Azure in your EA (e.g., 5% off consumption). At renewal, these are not guaranteed – if not renegotiated, you may revert to the list price. And in CSP, typically, you get whatever small discount the partner passes on. So, a hidden cost could be losing a negotiated Azure discount. Be sure during renewal talks to confirm any Azure pricing. Azure is often not price-protected, unlike licenses, during the EA term, requiring diligence.
- Hybrid Use Rights and Compliance: If you’ve used Azure Hybrid Benefit (AHB) for Windows or SQL Server in Azure under your EA, ensure you have enough qualifying licenses to continue that. A pitfall is to assume it’ll just continue – at renewal, if you drop certain on-prem licenses, you might inadvertently lose rights to AHB and then face higher Azure costs (paying full price for VMs). It’s a subtle linkage between your EA licensing and cloud usage. Therefore, double-check that whatever you renew (or don’t renew) regarding server licenses doesn’t negatively affect your cloud cost structure.
- Overlooking New Cloud Services: Microsoft constantly releases new services (e.g., in 2023-2024, think of Power Platform, Teams premium features, or AI add-ons like Copilot). At renewal, review the Product Terms for new services and their licensing. A pitfall is not realizing that a new service you start to use might not be covered and will incur extra costs. Perhaps a certain feature was free or in preview during your last EA, and now it requires a license. If you miss it, you may be out of compliance or face unexpected charges later. Ask, “What’s new since our last EA that we plan to use, and how is it licensed?”
Preparing for a Smooth Renewal
To avoid all these pitfalls, preparation is everything. Some final tips on preparation align with avoiding hidden costs:
- Inventory and Clean House: Months before renewal, do a full inventory of your licenses, what’s used, and what can be dropped. This will reveal any “shelfware” to terminate and highlight any usage that’s not properly licensed. It’s much cheaper to adjust now than to pay for it unknowingly later.
- Engage Stakeholders Early: Legal can help identify vague contract clauses (such as evergreen or notice language). Finance can help model scenarios (so volume tier changes don’t surprise you). IT department heads can confirm if certain software is still needed at the same levels. By involving all parties, you cover the blind spots.
- Negotiate Terms, Not Just Price: As the pitfalls illustrate, contract terms around flexibility, definitions, and future pricing are critical. It’s not just about reducing the dollar figure. For example, ask for an amendment that allows for a mid-term reduction if you divest a division (some customers have clauses that allow them to drop a percentage of licenses mid-term in such events). Or negotiate an option to extend the EA by one year at the same pricing (to avoid the Year-4 price cliff if needed). You might also ensure that an early-termination clause for specific situations is written in – even if it is rarely granted, it doesn’t hurt to try if you have concerns.
- Consider Expert Help: If your enterprise agreement is large or complex, investing in a licensing expert or advisory firm for the renewal phase can pay for itself. They can identify hidden “gotchas” you might miss, from language nuances to unusual billing metrics. This isn’t a requirement for everyone, but given the high cost of mistakes, it’s considered a risk mitigation measure.
By going into your Microsoft EA renewal with eyes wide open and a detailed plan, you can convert what could be a trap-filled process into a well-managed negotiation.
Awareness is more than half the battle – once you know what to watch for, you can proactively address each issue, leaving no nasty surprises in your next EA.
Recommendations
- Start Renewal Prep Early: Begin at least 6-12 months in advance. This gives you time to uncover hidden clauses, analyze usage, and avoid last-minute pressure where mistakes are more likely to occur.
- Audit Your Current Usage: Perform an internal true-up before Microsoft does. Identify any unlicensed usage or over-provisioning now, so you can correct or budget for it, rather than be surprised later.
- Check for “Evergreen” Gotchas: Scrutinize your agreements for auto-renewal clauses or notice periods that could extend beyond the initial term. For any service you don’t plan to renew, give timely written notice to avoid unwanted extensions.
- Model Different Scenarios: Calculate costs for renewal scenarios – including status quo, reduction, and growth, as well as EA vs. CSP. This will highlight where tier pricing changes or lost discounts create cost jumps so that you can address them in negotiations.
- Verify Definitions in the Contract: Don’t assume—get clarity on terms like “Qualified User” or product use rights. If needed, negotiate custom clarifications or document agreed-upon interpretations with Microsoft to prevent future disputes.
- Consider a Partial Move to CSP: Evaluate whether some of your licenses or new needs are better suited to CSP for flexibility. Weigh the cost carefully—perhaps use CSP for volatile or project-based needs and keep core stable licenses in the EA for optimal pricing.
- Negotiate Flexibility Clauses: Where possible, include terms that allow adjustments, such as the option to drop a certain percentage of licenses mid-term if the business contracts or a price hold for a fourth year if you choose to extend briefly. Getting even small concessions can save money later.
- Don’t Ignore Support and Add-ons: Treat support contracts, Azure commitments, and any secondary agreements as part of the renewal. Renegotiate those alongside the EA so you’re not caught by auto-renewed support at higher rates or misaligned cloud terms.
- Engage in a Detailed Line-by-Line Review: When Microsoft presents a renewal quote or contract draft, review every line item and clause carefully. Pitfalls hide in the fine print (like a new service added by default or a changed term in the renewal paperwork). Meticulous review is non-negotiable.
- Document Everything: Keep a clear record of what you agreed to, especially if any exceptions or special terms were negotiated via email or calls. Ensure they are included in the contract. A well-documented renewal means fewer “he said, she said” issues if questions arise later about what was intended.
FAQ
Q1: What’s the biggest mistake enterprises make in Microsoft EA renewals?
A1: The biggest mistake is treating the renewal as a routine purchase rather than a strategic negotiation. This can lead to rubber-stamping the old agreement without questioning terms or right-sizing your needs. That means missing opportunities to drop unused licenses, failing to catch tricky clauses (such as auto-renewals or price increases), and ultimately paying more or being locked into unfavorable conditions. Always approach renewal as a chance to renegotiate everything, not just pricing.
Q2: What exactly is an “evergreen” clause in a Microsoft agreement?
A2: An evergreen clause is an auto-renewal provision – it means the contract or service continues for another term unless you actively cancel it. In Microsoft’s context, the EA itself usually isn’t evergreen (it expires unless renewed), but elements like the Microsoft Customer Agreement (used in CSP) are evergreen. If you buy via CSP, your Microsoft relationship has no end date; your subscriptions just keep renewing. Also, support agreements or certain subscriptions might have evergreen terms. The risk is if you forget to cancel or negotiate, they roll over, and you’re stuck for another period. So, treat evergreen services with caution: set reminders to review or cancel well before renewal dates.
Q3: How can pricing tiers affect my renewal costs?
A3: Microsoft’s volume pricing tiers mean that your discounts depend on how many licenses/users you have. If, at renewal, you have significantly fewer licenses (for example, due to layoffs or efficiency measures), you may be downgraded to a lower tier and lose some of your discount percentage. This makes each license cost more. Conversely, if you grew, you might qualify for a better tier – that’s a good thing, but ensure Microsoft gives you the improved discount. It’s wise to explicitly discuss tier changes with your rep. The tier thresholds aren’t always publicly disclosed, but you can infer them or ask (e.g., 500, 2,400, 6,000, and 15,000 seats as rough cut-offs). Knowing where you stand helps you predict if your per-unit cost will jump. If a drop in volume is temporary, you might consider negotiating with Microsoft to hold your pricing (honor the higher-tier discount) if you expect to scale back up later. However, this is not guaranteed, it is worth asking.
Q4: What hidden charges should I watch for during an EA renewal?
A4: Some common ones: True-up back-charges (for any unreported increases in usage – get an accurate count to avoid a surprise bill). Legacy software fees – if you’re still using older products not in mainstream offerings, they might carry higher costs or need special licenses at renewal. New service inclusion – sometimes Microsoft’s renewal quote might sneak in a new product trial or bundle (like “Windows E5” or an extra security add-on) that wasn’t in your last deal; if you don’t need it, opt out, or you’ll pay more. Currency adjustments – if your EA is priced in a non-USD currency, Microsoft periodically adjusts prices for exchange rates; renewal may include a price increase. Audit true-up – If a compliance issue is discovered (perhaps through a SAM engagement), Microsoft may require you to purchase licenses for past shortfalls as part of the renewal. That’s a hidden cost if you weren’t aware of a shortfall. The solution is a thorough self-audit and questioning every line item on the renewal offer.
Q5: How does CSP differ from EA at renewal time?
A5: With an EA, renewal time is a big event every 3 years, where you renegotiate terms and pricing for the next term. With CSP, there isn’t a single giant renewal – each subscription (product) has its own renewal cycle (monthly or annual). So, the dynamic changes: instead of a huge negotiation, you have an ongoing series of smaller renewals. The pros are that you can constantly adjust and are not locked into a long deal. The cons: you might not have the same leverage to negotiate big discounts, and you must stay on top of many renewal dates. Additionally, CSP is facilitated through a partner, so negotiations often focus on their margin or incentives rather than directly with Microsoft on licensing terms. One trap at “renewal” for CSP is complacency. If you simply let all subscriptions auto-renew annually, you may miss the opportunity to remove excess licenses or switch providers for a better rate.
Q6: Can we reduce licenses or switch plans at renewal without penalty?
A6: One of the advantages of the EA renewal point is that you can usually reduce quantities or switch to different products for the new term. For example, if you have 1,000 E5 licenses and discover that only 800 users need E5 and 200 could use E3, you can make that change effective with the new EA term. There’s no penalty for dropping licenses at renewal, as long as you still meet the minimum requirements (e.g., 500-user minimum). The key is you must make the change at renewal – during the term, you couldn’t reduce, but renewal is your clean slate. Be sure to communicate these changes during negotiations, not after signing (post-signing, you’re locked again). In CSP, you can reduce on the fly (monthly or at each annual renewal per subscription), which is even more flexible. But with EA, consider renewing your window to resize commitments without penalty.
Q7: How do we avoid paying for unused licenses when renewing?
A7: The strategy is twofold: identify unused licenses before renewal and don’t renew them. It sounds simple, but in practice, it is essential to run usage reports for all Microsoft 365 services and compare active users with licensed users. Check if you have whole chunks of licenses provisioned but not assigned to anyone. Also, review if certain departments bought licenses that aren’t deployed. Armed with that, create a list of licenses to eliminate. Communicate with those business units early so they know that these will be removed (in case it prompts them to start using them or contest it). During renewal negotiations, ensure the draft agreement reflects the reduced counts. Microsoft (and sometimes internal stakeholders) may push back, but stick to data – e.g., “We consistently had 100 licenses unused, we will not renew those 100.” Additionally, consider moving some users to lower-cost plans if they don’t use full features, which is another form of cost avoidance. In summary, thorough analysis and firm decision-making before signing the new EA will prevent paying for stuff you don’t need.
Q8: Are there pitfalls related to Azure in an EA renewal?
A8: Yes, a few. If you had an Azure monetary commitment (prepaid amount), check if you used it fully. The unused commit is gone. When renewing, you may switch to an Azure plan (pay-as-you-go) or establish a new commitment based on actual usage trends to avoid overcommitting (wasting money) or undercommitting (missing out on potential discounts). Another pitfall: if you enjoyed some special discount or consumption rate under your EA, verify if it continues. Microsoft sometimes gives extra Azure consumption incentives during an EA (like a dev/test rate or promotional credits). At renewal, they might quietly drop those unless you notice and ask for them. Finally, if you plan to migrate more to Azure, consider negotiating some Azure credits or funds as part of the EA renewal – if you don’t ask, that opportunity is missed. On the flip side, don’t commit to more Azure spend than you can realistically achieve, or you’ll scramble to utilize it or forfeit value at term’s end.
Q9: What vague terms should I clarify in the EA during renewal?
A9: Key ones include the definition of “Enterprise” (which entities are covered), “Qualified Users/Devices” as discussed (who needs a license), and any ambiguous usage metrics (like how multi-tenant scenarios are handled, or what constitutes “usage” for certain cloud services). If you use third-party vendors or outsourcers, clarify whether they need licenses under your agreement or are covered separately. Also, review the true-up process terms to ensure it’s clear when and how you report increases, so you’re not penalized for an oversight. If your legal team spots any “weasel words” like “reasonable notice” or “substantial use,” consider clarifying those (even if just in an email from Microsoft you keep on file). Ensure the document accurately lists all products and editions you expect to receive; sometimes, a misnomer or incorrect version number could confuse entitlements later. Essentially, any sentence that makes you say “what exactly does that mean in practice?” is worth clarifying now.
Q10: How do we decide between renewing the EA or moving to CSP?
A10 refers to your organization’s size, cost priorities, and flexibility needs. Generally, if you have over 500 users and plan to continue using a broad range of Microsoft products, an EA often provides better pricing and a predictable framework. Renew it if you value the discount and can commit for 3 years. Move to CSP if you need more adaptability – for example, if you anticipate downsizing, want to pay as you go, even if it’s slightly more expensive, or if Microsoft no longer offers you an EA for certain subscriptions. Some companies choose CSP to avoid signing big commitments during uncertain times. Perform a cost comparison: sometimes a mix is best (keep EA for core services, use CSP for specific cloud services). Also consider support: EA comes with direct Microsoft account management; CSP means you’ll work through a partner for support and changes. CSP can work well if your partner is very hands-on and adds value. You might miss that in CSP if you rely heavily on Microsoft engagement (e.g., tech strategists, etc., who often focus on large EAs). In summary, decide based on a cost analysis and how you prefer to manage the relationship – either a large upfront negotiation or ongoing, nimble adjustments.
Read about our Microsoft Negotiation Services.
