Microsoft EA vs. CSP: Which Microsoft Licensing Model Fits Your Organization?

Microsoft EA vs. CSP

Microsoft’s Enterprise Agreement (EA) and Cloud Solution Provider (CSP) programs are two primary licensing models with very different value propositions.

EA provides volume discounts and price locks in exchange for a multi-year commitment, while CSP emphasizes flexibility with month-to-month licensing through a partner.

Understanding the differences in cost, contract commitment, support, and flexibility is crucial for CIOs, CTOs, and IT procurement leaders to select the model that best suits their organization’s needs.

Read about Microsoft EA Renewal Strategies.

Microsoft Enterprise Agreement (EA)

The Enterprise Agreement (EA) is Microsoft’s traditional volume licensing contract aimed at large enterprises.

It typically runs for a three-year term and requires a commitment to a set number of licenses (usually covering all “qualified” users or devices within the enterprise).

Key characteristics of an EA include:

• Minimum Size and Term: Historically, it requires at least ~500 users (Microsoft has hinted that this minimum could rise to 1,000) and a 3-year commitment. EAs sometimes extend to 5-year deals for very large customers.
• Upfront Commitment: Organizations select products (e.g., Microsoft 365 E3/E5, Windows, Azure credits) and commit to an initial quantity. This establishes a baseline for the term.
• Volume Discounts: In exchange for the large commitment, Microsoft offers tiered discounts off list prices. For example, an EA at “Level A” (500 users) gets a smaller discount, while “Level D” (15,000+ users) yields the deepest base discounts. Enterprises can often negotiate additional discounts beyond standard tiers, especially at renewal.
• Fixed Pricing: Pricing for the chosen products is locked for the term. This protection shields the customer from Microsoft’s public price increases for those products during the EA and provides budget predictability for three years.
• Annual True-Up: Each year on the agreement anniversary, the customer reports any increase in license counts (e.g., new employees or added products) and is billed pro rata for those additions in the future. However, reducing licenses mid-term is generally not allowed (you’re stuck with the initial commitment until the EA expires, unless you negotiated special terms).
• Software Assurance Benefits: EAs typically include Software Assurance, meaning you get rights to new product versions and some benefits (training days, 24/7 phone support for critical issues, etc.) bundled into the pricing. Software assurance fees account for approximately 25% of the annual license cost, which is already factored into EA pricing for many products.
• Direct Relationship: The EA is contracted directly with Microsoft or through a Microsoft Licensing Solution Provider (LSP); in either case, Microsoft remains deeply involved. You usually negotiate with Microsoft’s account team, and the LSP handles the paperwork and procurement.

When EA Works Best:

Organizations with stable or growing workforce sizes and standardized IT needs often favor EAs. An EA can be cost-effective if you can accurately forecast your licensing needs for the next 3 years and want the lowest unit pricing.

Enterprises running primarily Microsoft software for all users (e.g., Office 365 for everyone, Windows Enterprise on all PCs) also benefit from EA’s all-in-one coverage.

Additionally, those requiring predictability in budgeting appreciate the fixed per-user or per-device costs of an EA.

Read How to Right-Size Your Microsoft EA Before Renewal.

Microsoft Cloud Solution Provider (CSP)

The Cloud Solution Provider (CSP) program is a modern licensing channel that allows you to purchase Microsoft subscriptions through a certified partner. It is designed for flexibility and ongoing adjustments.

Instead of a long contract directly with Microsoft, you have an agreement with a CSP partner (reseller) that manages your licenses.

Key features of CSP include:

• No Minimum and Flexible Term: No minimum seat requirement – CSP can accommodate small to enterprise customers. You can add or remove licenses on a monthly basis. There is no 3-year lock; you can cancel or downsize at any time (or at least at the next monthly billing cycle) if needs change. CSP offers 1-month, 1-year, or 3-year subscription options for certain products, but even the annual subscriptions are more flexible than an EA in that you can choose not to renew them the next cycle.
• Pay-as-You-Go Pricing: Licenses are generally billed monthly per user (or per usage for Azure). You pay only for what you use. If an employee leaves, you can reduce the license count the next month and stop paying for that user. This on-demand scaling can help organizations save costs, especially those with fluctuating workforces or seasonal needs.
• Partner-Provided Support and Services: In CSP, your partner serves as your primary point of contact for support and services. The CSP partner handles technical support, billing assistance, and licensing management, often with 24/7 support as part of the service. This is a value-add: unlike EA, where you might need to purchase a pricey Microsoft Unified Support contract separately, CSP usually bundles basic support in the subscription cost or partner margin. The partner also often provides value-added services, such as usage monitoring, optimization advice, and a self-service portal for managing licenses.
• Monthly Pricing (Potentially Higher Unit Cost): CSP pricing is typically based on Microsoft’s retail rates, and partners may offer a small discount off that or add fees for their services. EA typically doesn’t offer large upfront volume discount tiers. For example, if Microsoft 365 E3 is ~$36 per user/month list price, an EA might get it for significantly less with volume discount (say ~$30), whereas CSP customers might pay around list price (though some partners give modest 5-10% discounts for large seat counts). Thus, per-unit costs in CSP can be higher for big enterprises compared to a well-discounted EA. However, the ability to turn off unused licenses can often offset the higher unit price.
• Always Current & Cloud-Focused: CSP covers Microsoft’s cloud subscriptions (Microsoft 365, Office 365, Azure, Dynamics 365, etc.) and ensures you’re always using the latest versions (licenses are subscription-based, so no separate upgrade purchases needed). On-premises licenses (perpetual) are not typically sold via CSP, except for certain server subscriptions. Organizations with heavy on-premises needs might use other agreements or purchase perpetual licenses separately.

When CSP Makes Sense:

Businesses that value agility and low commitment prefer CSP. If your user count or product needs change frequently, for instance, companies with high turnover, contractors, mergers, or rapid growth or shrinkage, CSP lets you scale up or down without being locked into paying for a product you might not use fully for 3 years.

CSP is also advantageous for smaller organizations or those with fewer than 500 seats that don’t qualify for an EA (or don’t want the rigidity of one).

Additionally, organizations that want more hands-on support experience often find that CSP partners can provide a higher-touch service than Microsoft’s standard support channels.

Read Key Microsoft EA Renewal Contract Terms You Should Always Negotiate.

Cost and Commitment: Pricing vs. Flexibility

One of the biggest differences between EA and CSP is the trade-off between unit price savings and flexibility:

• Upfront Discounts (EA) vs. Pay for Use (CSP): With an EA, you negotiate pricing based on a bulk commitment, often achieving double-digit percentage discounts off Microsoft’s price list. Large enterprises (e.g., those with 10,000+ seats) can secure aggressive pricing, making EA the most cost-effective option per license under ideal conditions. CSP, by contrast, usually follows standard pricing with minimal discounts. The CSP benefit is that you never pay for licenses you’re not using. For many mid-sized organizations, the cost of unused licenses in an EA can outweigh the per-license discount. Industry analysis shows that some companies have saved 10-20% on their overall IT spend by switching from EA to CSP, simply by eliminating “shelfware” and over-provisioning.
• Budget Predictability vs. Agility: An EA locks in your spend for 3 years – good for finance predictability, but requires confidence in your long-term needs. CSP bills can fluctuate monthly with usage, which is more agile but less predictable. You can mitigate this by using annual CSP subscriptions for core staff (to possibly get better pricing and stability) and monthly subscriptions for swing users or projects. With EA, you know the annual bill in advance (barring added true-up costs for growth). With CSP, you must watch for Microsoft’s pricing changes (e.g., if Microsoft raises cloud subscription prices, CSP pricing will reflect that immediately after your current term ends, whereas EA would shield you until renewal).
• Azure and Cloud Spend: For Azure cloud consumption, EA often involves committing a specific dollar amount for three years (Azure monetary commitment). This can secure an Azure discount or incentives, but requires forecasting three years of cloud usage. If you over-commit, you risk unused Azure budget that can’t be refunded. CSP Azure is a pay-as-you-go monthly service; you only pay for what you consume, and many CSP partners also offer a percentage discount on Azure consumption. This means a lower risk of overcommitting on cloud resources in CSP; however, very large Azure users may still receive better discounts through an EA or Microsoft Customer Agreement if they negotiate effectively.

Real-World Example:

Consider a company with 1,000 employees planning to deploy Microsoft 365 E5 to all. Under an EA, if they negotiate a 15% discount, they might pay roughly $48 per user per month (versus the $57 list price) for 3 years, for an annual spend of around $576,000.

In CSP, they might pay the full $57 per user (unless the partner offers a small discount), totaling $ 57,000 per year, if all 1,000 users stay licensed year-round. However, suppose the company later downsizes to 800 users.

In that case, the EA still requires paying for 1,000 licenses until renewal (wasting ~$108k/year on 200 unused licenses).

In contrast, CSP could immediately drop those 200 licenses, bringing the cost down to $547,000 for the next month.

This illustrates that CSP can yield savings when your usage drops or fluctuates, whereas EA rewards a stable or growing usage with lower prices locked in.

Support and Service Considerations

Another critical difference is in how support and account management are handled:

• Support in EA: An Enterprise Agreement does not automatically include comprehensive support from Microsoft beyond what is provided with Software Assurance (SA). SA offers some basic help, including 24/7 phone support for severity-1 issues, planning services, and training vouchers. Typically, large enterprises also purchase a Unified Support or Premier Support contract separately for broad, proactive support, which can be very costly (often a percentage of your EA spend or a flat fee). With an EA, your primary interaction is with Microsoft’s licensing and support infrastructure. Some customers appreciate having direct Microsoft contact; however, Microsoft’s support can feel “standardized” and less personalized unless you pay for higher support tiers.
• Support in CSP: Under CSP, the partner is responsible for support. Good CSP partners provide 24/7 help desks, cloud solution architects, and customer success managers to proactively assist you. They will escalate to Microsoft on your behalf if needed, but you have a single point of contact for any issues or questions. This can greatly simplify vendor management – you call your partner for anything from a billing question to a technical issue. Many enterprises moving to CSP appreciate the high-touch, personalized support model. This support is typically included in the partner’s margin or service offering, so you might not need a separate Microsoft support contract for day-to-day needs. (Note that the support quality may vary by partner; choosing a reputable CSP provider with a strong support track record is important.)
• Account Management: With an EA, Microsoft and a licensing partner (LSP) manage your account, but Microsoft’s priorities might be more on revenue and renewals. In a CSP relationship, the partner often assumes a consultative role, advising on license optimizations, informing you of new products or cost-saving opportunities, and even assisting with technology adoption (since it’s in their interest to keep you satisfied and renewing monthly). Essentially, CSP can feel like having an extension of your IT team focusing on Microsoft licensing and cloud management.

Flexibility and Scalability

In today’s fast-changing business environment, the ability to adjust licenses quickly is a significant factor:

• Scaling Users Up or Down: EA allows increasing licenses at any time (you just report in the next true-up and pay for additions). Scaling down is not permitted until the EA term ends, unless you negotiated an Early Reduction clause or chose an Enterprise Subscription enrollment, which uniquely permits reductions at the anniversary. By default, EA is a “use it or not, you’ve paid for it” model. CSP, on the other hand, enables scaling both up and down seamlessly. If you hire 100 contractors for a project, you can add licenses for a couple of months and then remove them when the project ends – you’re only billed for the actual months used. This elasticity is invaluable for organizations with variable staffing or uncertain forecasts.
• Product Flexibility: Under an EA, you’re somewhat locked into the products you initially select (the EA can cover a broad catalog, but the key is that you’re committed to specific product quantities). Suppose you want to swap one product for another mid-term. In that case, it usually means adding the new product licenses (paying extra) and possibly dropping the old ones at renewal time, rather than swapping them. In negotiations, some companies push for the right to “substitute equivalent products” or adjust bundles, but Microsoft doesn’t usually allow easy swapping in the contract. CSP is more flexible – since you can add or drop subscriptions, you could shift budgets between different Microsoft services over time (e.g., reduce some Office 365 licenses and increase Dynamics 365 licenses) as needs evolve, without waiting for a contract renewal.
• Contract Changes: With an EA, any change in terms (such as adding a new type of product not originally included in the agreement) typically requires a formal amendment or additional enrollment. It’s doable, but it’s a process through Microsoft’s contract apparatus. Because CSP is an on-demand model, you purchase what you need through the partner’s portal or sales rep. Need a new product SKU? Just order it for next month, no long contract amendments are needed.

Side-by-Side Comparison

To summarize the key differences, the following table compares Microsoft EA and CSP across major factors:

Which Model Fits Your Organization?

Choosing between EA and CSP comes down to your organization’s size, financial priorities, and need for flexibility:

• Large, Stable Enterprises: If you have thousands of users and relatively stable IT needs (or the ability to accurately predict growth), an EA can yield the lowest per-license costs and simplify licensing under one agreement. For example, a global firm with 10,000 employees standardized on Microsoft 365 might favor an EA to lock in discounts and simplify compliance. However, ensure you will use what you commit to – EAs can lead to overspending if you overestimate needs.
• Growing or Variable Organizations: If your headcount or IT service usage is likely to change significantly, due to seasonal workforce, rapid growth, or uncertain market conditions, CSP is usually the safer choice. It eliminates the need to pay for unused licenses and provides flexibility. A tech startup or a company that frequently acquires/divests units would benefit from CSP’s month-to-month flexibility.
• Budgeting Style: Organizations that require fixed, long-term budget certainty may lean toward EA (knowing the 3-year cost envelope), whereas those that operate on more agile or OpEx-focused budgeting may prefer CSP, treating software as a true variable operational expense aligned with actual use.
• Support Needs: Consider whether you value having Microsoft provide direct support (and are willing to pay for Premier or Unified Support) or prefer a partner’s concierge-style support. A CSP’s extra guidance can be very helpful if your IT team is small. This might be less of a factor if you have a large IT department and existing Microsoft support channels.
• Mix and Match: It’s Not All or Nothing. Some enterprises use an EA for core products and supplement with CSP for specific needs. For instance, you might maintain an EA for Windows and Office base licensing for all employees, but utilize CSP for specific cloud services or smaller subsidiaries and test environments. Additionally, Microsoft’s newer Microsoft Customer Agreement (MCA) sometimes supersedes EAs for cloud services, allowing for future licensing to incorporate blended models.

Recommendations

• Assess Your License Usage Trends: Analyze your current and projected Microsoft license usage to inform your decision. CSP’s pay-for-use model can trim waste if you’ve historically over-bought licenses.
• Calculate the 3-Year Cost: Model the total cost for both EA and CSP options over 3 years. Include license costs, support costs, and potential true-up fees. This TCO analysis will highlight which is more cost-effective under expected scenarios.
• Consider a Trial Pivot: If you’re on an EA currently but considering CSP, try shifting a small subset of users or a new project to CSP via a partner. This pilot can reveal savings and challenges before a full switch.
• Negotiate Your EA Aggressively: If an EA seems right, negotiate for flexibility (such as an EA Subscription for cloud services that allows for reductions or the addition of a clause to permit some license swaps) and ensure you obtain strong discounts (benchmark against similar companies). A well-negotiated EA can include concessions that mitigate some rigidity.
• Choose the Right CSP Partner: If you are going CSP, select a reputable partner with experience in your industry and region. A good partner will transact licenses and provide strategic guidance to continuously optimize your Microsoft spending.
• Hybrid Approach: Don’t be afraid to use both models where they fit best. You might use EA for core enterprise-wide products and CSP for niche or unpredictable needs. Microsoft licensing isn’t one-size-fits-all, especially in large organizations.
• Stay Informed on Microsoft Changes: Microsoft’s licensing programs evolve (for example, introduction of the MCA, or changes to EA minimums). Regularly review program updates with your Microsoft rep or CSP to ensure your current model remains the optimal choice for your situation.
• Plan for Renewal or Transition: If your EA is nearing its end, evaluate CSP (and MCA) at least 6-12 months in advance. This gives time to compare offers and avoid rushing into an unfavorable renewal. Similarly, if you are considering moving from EA to CSP, plan the transition to avoid any lapse in coverage or support.
• Budget for Support: In EA, remember to budget for support contracts in addition to licensing. In CSP, verify what support level is included by the partner and if there is an extra fee for premium support. Make support quality and cost part of your decision criteria.
• Compliance and Record-Keeping: Regardless of model, maintain accurate records of licenses and usage. EAs are subject to true-up audits, and CSP usage is continually metered. Good Software Asset Management practices prevent surprises in both scenarios.

FAQ

Q1: What’s an enterprise’s biggest mistake in choosing between EA and CSP?
A1: A common mistake is not aligning the licensing model with their business reality. For example, signing a 3-year EA for a “best price” without realistic usage forecasting, then overpaying for unused licenses, or conversely, avoiding an EA due to fear of commitment and ending up paying more under CSP at list prices. Always base your decision on data, including growth projections, workforce variability, and budget strategy.

Q2: Is an EA always cheaper than CSP for a large company?
A2: Not necessarily. At the same time, the per-license cost in an EA can be lower due to volume discounts, which only saves money if you need and use all those licenses. Large companies with stable usage often see savings with an EA. However, CSP can be cheaper if a company’s usage drops or fluctuates because you’re not paying for idle licenses. Additionally, CSP partners can sometimes offer competitive discounts for large seat counts, narrowing the gap. It depends on your usage pattern and negotiation – run the numbers for both scenarios.

Q3: Can smaller organizations (under 500 users) get an EA, or is CSP the only option?
A3: Microsoft’s typical EA minimum is 500 users, and they strongly steer smaller customers to CSP or other programs. In practice, if you’re slightly under the threshold, Microsoft might allow an EA (especially via a reseller), but if you’re significantly small, an EA likely isn’t available or worthwhile. CSP is designed to cater to organizations of all sizes, with no minimum, so it’s generally the go-to solution for companies with fewer than 500 seats. Also consider Microsoft’s Customer Agreement (MCA), a newer contract model for any size, though it functions more like CSP (pay-as-you-go) than a traditional EA.

Q4: How does support differ between EA and CSP?
A4: With an EA, you deal directly with Microsoft and usually need a separate support agreement (like Unified Support) for dedicated help, which can be expensive. Support tickets may go through Microsoft’s queues. In CSP, your partner provides support as part of the service, and you have a dedicated team to call for any issues. They will handle Microsoft interactions on your behalf. Many enterprises prefer CSP support for its personalized touch and faster response, whereas EA support is more standardized, unless you opt for premium Microsoft support.

Q5: What happens if we add a new product or service in the middle of an EA?
A5: You can certainly purchase additional Microsoft products mid-term, but you’ll usually do so by amending your EA or via an additional enrollment. The new product will be added at Microsoft’s current price (unless you negotiated a blanket discount). You’ll then true-up those licenses moving forward. In CSP, adding a new product is as simple as ordering it through your partner’s portal – effective immediately, with no contract change required. This is why CSP can adapt faster to new technology needs (like suddenly deploying a new security service or collaboration tool organization-wide).

Q6: Are there any penalties if we want to exit an EA early or reduce licenses?
A6: An EA is a firm commitment – there’s no straightforward way to exit early without penalty. If you choose an Enterprise Subscription EA (a variant), you can reduce licenses at the anniversary or not renew at the 3-year mark (you’d lose rights to the software you drop). But a standard EA with perpetual licenses has no built-in early termination clause; you’re expected to pay for the full term. Enterprises sometimes negotiate an early termination or reduction right (for example, with a fee or under specific conditions, such as a divestiture). Still, those are special cases and must be negotiated upfront in contract language. CSP, in contrast, allows for the cancellation of subscriptions (typically with one month’s notice or simply turning off renewal for an annual term) with no further fees – it’s inherently low-commitment.

Q7: We have subsidiaries in different countries – is EA or CSP better for global organizations?
A7: EAs can be structured to cover multiple affiliates and regions under a single master agreement, which provides a consolidated view and potentially better volume discounts globally. That said, CSP is also available globally, and you could use either a global or regional CSP partner. One thing to consider is currency and local pricing: EAs might lock pricing in a single currency or region. CSP pricing will follow the local currency rates and any Microsoft regional price adjustments (Microsoft periodically adjusts country pricing). An EA can sometimes shield you from forex swings if you operate in volatile currency markets. On the other hand, CSP might allow each region to scale independently. It often comes down to how centralized your IT procurement is – large multinationals often use an EA for central control, possibly supplemented by local CSP arrangements for flexibility in certain regions.

Q8: Can we transition from an EA to CSP easily if we switch?
A8: Many organizations shift from EA to CSP at their EA renewal time. The transition involves working with a CSP partner to replicate your licensing under CSP subscriptions. It’s essential to schedule the new CSP licenses to start before the EA ends, thereby avoiding gaps. Microsoft offers an enrollment called “EA to CSP transfer,” which allows certain cloud services to be transferred without interruption. If you have perpetual licenses from an EA (from buying Office or Windows outright), those remain yours even after the EA ends (with rights to use the last version available at contract end). But new updates would require buying Software Assurance or subscriptions later. Generally, moving to CSP is straightforward for cloud services like Microsoft 365 or Azure – it’s mostly a billing change and perhaps reassigning licenses in the admin portal with the partner’s help.

Q9: How do price increases work under each model?
A9: Under an EA, your prices for the chosen products are fixed for the 3-year term (that’s a key benefit – Microsoft often raises cloud subscription prices annually or due to currency adjustments, but EA customers are safe from those until renewal). However, at renewal, Microsoft might present higher prices, so it’s essential to negotiate caps or be prepared to adjust usage if a significant hike occurs. Under CSP, pricing is subject to Microsoft’s adjustments after any committed term. Microsoft could raise the price for month-to-month subscriptions, and you’d see it in the next month’s bill (though they usually give partners a few months’ notice of impending price changes). For annual CSP subscriptions, your price is locked for that year; however, it may change when you renew for the next year. EA gives short-term price security, and CSP reflects market pricing more dynamically. Keep an eye on Microsoft’s announcements; for instance, Microsoft might align global prices or adjust for inflation, which could directly impact CSP customers at the next billing cycle.

Q10: What’s the future of EA vs CSP – is Microsoft phasing out EAs?
A10: Microsoft is evolving its licensing programs. For pure cloud services, Microsoft introduced the Microsoft Customer Agreement (MCA), a simplified agreement that replaces EAs for certain customers. CSP itself has a “New Commerce Experience” model that standardizes terms. Microsoft appears to be nudging many customers (especially smaller and mid-sized ones) away from traditional EAs towards the MCA/CSP approach, which is more consumption-based. However, EAs are still used for large enterprises and those with complex needs. In 2025 and beyond, we expect EAs to continue, possibly with higher minimum requirements and more focus on Azure commits and bundled offerings. CSP will likely expand and remain the go-to for flexibility. Enterprises should stay agile–even if you choose one model now, re-evaluate at each renewal or major business change to see if the other model (or a new Microsoft offering) might serve you better.

Read about our Microsoft Negotiation Services.

Do you want to know more about our Microsoft Negotiation Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit