Negotiating Azure & Cloud Spend Commitments

Negotiating Azure & Cloud Spend Commitments

Introduction – Why Azure Commitments Matter

Azure has become central to Microsoft’s revenue strategy, and Microsoft’s sales teams push hard for multi-year cloud commitments.

For CIOs, CFOs, and IT procurement leaders, this means any Azure contract negotiation needs to be approached carefully.

Without a strong negotiation, companies can end up overspending and locked into inflexible contracts. Poorly negotiated Azure deals often result in paying for unused cloud services or being stuck with terms that don’t fit your business needs.

Microsoft often forecasts optimistic consumption growth and encourages a substantial, long-term commitment. But you should approach those forecasts with healthy skepticism.

The goal of this guide is to equip buyers with a framework to secure flexibility and savings in their Azure agreements. By taking a strategic, buyer-first stance, you can optimize cloud spend commitments and avoid financial risks in long-term cloud deals.

Understanding Azure Commitment Models

When planning an Azure commitment, it’s important to choose the right contract model. Microsoft offers a few different avenues, each with its own pricing and flexibility profile:

• Enterprise Agreement (EA): A traditional 3-year contract for large enterprises that covers Azure (often alongside other Microsoft products). EAs typically require a monetary commitment to Azure spend each year. In exchange, you get volume discounts and predictable pricing. However, EAs lock you in for the term – if your needs change, it’s difficult to reduce your commitment. EAs generally offer the best discounts for large, up-front commitments but come with less flexibility.
• Microsoft Customer Agreement (MCA): A newer, more flexible contract model that often works on pay-as-you-go terms. Under an MCA (sometimes called an Azure plan), you don’t have a multi-year lock-in or a required upfront spend. Instead, you pay for Azure services monthly and can adjust usage or even cancel without a long commitment. This flexibility is great if your cloud needs may fluctuate. The trade-off is that pricing under an MCA might be closer to standard rates unless you still negotiate custom terms. MCAs are common for mid-sized organizations or those transitioning to the cloud who want to avoid overcommitting.
• Cloud Solution Provider (CSP): Purchasing Azure through a Microsoft partner or reseller. In the CSP route, a third-party provider manages your Azure subscription and billing. This model can offer flexibility similar to MCA (monthly scaling of usage), and CSPs may provide slight discounts or additional services. A CSP agreement might not require a long-term commitment, but you’ll be subject to the partner’s pricing (which includes their margin). CSP is often used by smaller organizations or those who prefer hands-on support from a partner. Discounts in CSP agreements can vary – large deals might be better in an EA, whereas smaller spends can go CSP for simplicity.

Each model differs in terms of pricing, flexibility, and available discounts. Enterprise Agreements can yield the deepest discounts but demand a firm commitment.

MCA and CSP agreements offer agility (you can scale cloud usage up or down), though the default pricing may be higher. The good news is that all models are negotiable to some extent.

If your Azure spend is significant, Microsoft will usually be willing to offer custom pricing or discounts even under an MCA or CSP deal. Choose the route that best aligns with your organization’s size and need for flexibility before you enter negotiations.

The Levers That Drive Azure Pricing

When negotiating an Azure commitment deal, it helps to understand the key levers that drive pricing.

Microsoft’s cloud pricing isn’t one-size-fits-all — it depends on several factors that you can potentially influence:

• Commitment Size and Term: The size of your commitment is the biggest factor in discounts. Committing to a large annual spend – or better yet, a multi-year commitment – gives you leverage to secure lower unit prices. Microsoft rewards bigger and longer commitments. For example, a multi-year Azure enterprise agreement negotiation involving millions of dollars in spend will attract a steeper discount than a small, one-year deal. Be aware, though: committing more than you need (overcommitting) just to get a bigger discount can backfire if you don’t use what you’ve paid for.
• Services Mix (Compute vs. PaaS vs. Storage): What you plan to use Azure for can affect the deal. A mix of services that includes high-margin or strategic services for Microsoft (like PaaS offerings, AI services, etc.) might give you extra bargaining power. On the other hand, if most of your spending is on commodity services like basic VMs and storage, the discount might mainly come from volume rather than service type. It’s worth asking Microsoft if certain workloads or new services can get special incentives. At a minimum, ensure your negotiated discount applies across all the Azure services you intend to use – sometimes Microsoft might give a great rate on one service but less on another. Strive for a balanced deal that covers your entire Azure usage portfolio.
• Global vs. Regional Deployment: Where you deploy Azure resources can influence costs due to regional price differences and currency exchange rates. If your organization operates in multiple regions or countries, take a global view in negotiations. Microsoft’s list prices can vary by region (and they periodically adjust regional prices to align with global rates or account for FX changes). Use that as leverage: negotiate a consistent discount globally and try to include price protections against currency fluctuations. For example, if you sign an Azure deal in a certain currency, you don’t want an unfavorable exchange rate shift to suddenly make your costs higher in another region. Additionally, consolidating your cloud spend under a single global agreement can increase your volume leverage compared to splitting commitments by region.
• Timing and Microsoft’s Fiscal Year: Timing can be a hidden lever for better pricing. Microsoft, like many vendors, has sales targets and is especially motivated as the end of fiscal periods approaches. Microsoft’s fiscal year ends on June 30 (with quarter ends in late September, December, and March). If you can align your negotiation to land near Microsoft’s year-end or quarter-end, you may find them far more flexible on price. Last-minute deals that help a sales team meet their quota could fetch extra discounts or credits. Leverage timing by planning your renewal or purchase to coincide with these crunch times. However, be cautious about Microsoft’s urgency – don’t get rushed into a subpar deal just because it’s quarter-end. Use the timing to your advantage: let them know you can close by their deadline if the offer is improved.

By understanding these pricing levers, you can approach Microsoft with specific asks. For instance, “We’re prepared to commit to X amount over 3 years (leveraging commitment size), but we need price protection globally, and we want the discount to cover all key services (leveraging mix and global scope). And by the way, we’re aware your fiscal year-end is coming – what can you do for us if we sign this quarter?” This mindset pushes Microsoft to sharpen the deal on multiple fronts.

Benchmarking Azure Deals

One of the most effective tools for negotiating an Azure commitment is benchmarking.

In other words, know what other companies similar to yours are paying for Azure. Microsoft’s initial offer is often not the final offer – they expect informed customers to push back.

Here’s why benchmarking matters and how to do it:

Why benchmarks matter:

If you negotiate in a vacuum, you only know what Microsoft tells you. They might claim “this is a very competitive rate” or “you’re getting our best discount,” but without market data, it’s hard to verify that. By gathering benchmarks, you arm yourself with evidence to challenge these claims.

Understanding the going rates for Azure spend at your scale ensures you don’t accept an inflated price. Microsoft has plenty of data on what others pay – you should too. Knowing typical discount percentages or effective rates in the industry gives you confidence to ask for more and not feel like you’re asking for the impossible.

Typical discount ranges:

While every deal is different, large Azure commitments (especially part of an Enterprise Agreement) often come with significant discounts. For example, a very large enterprise committing $5M+ per year might negotiate on the order of 20–30% off Azure list prices.

Mid-sized commitments (say hundreds of thousands to low single-digit millions) might see smaller discounts, perhaps 5–15% off, depending on how aggressively you negotiate and what services you’re using.

These ranges aren’t guarantees, but they’re common in the market. If Microsoft’s offer to you is far outside these ranges (for instance, only 5% off on a multi-million dollar deal), that’s a red flag that you may be able to push much harder. Use peer benchmarks or consult cloud cost advisors to understand what a fair discount looks like for your level of spend.

Evaluate per-unit pricing:

Don’t just focus on the headline discount percentage – also break down the deal into per-unit costs for key services. Calculate what you will effectively be paying per VM hour, per GB of storage, per database instance, etc., under the proposed deal. Compare those to standard pay-as-you-go rates and to any competitive cloud quotes. This helps reveal if the deal truly represents “cloud spend optimization.”

For example, you might find that with a 20% discount, your cost for a certain VM is $X/hour, which might still be higher than a comparable AWS or Google Cloud quote. That insight can drive further negotiation or justify leveraging a competitor’s pricing. The goal is to ensure your Azure unit costs are as low as they should be for your size.

If not, bring those data points to Microsoft and ask for improvements. In summary, always do the math on your effective discounts – it prevents you from being dazzled by a nominal discount that doesn’t actually translate into real savings.

By benchmarking and analyzing your deal metrics, you gain a powerful negotiation edge. Microsoft will realize you’ve done your homework and won’t settle for an above-market deal. This often forces them to come back with a better offer or creative concessions to match what you know is achievable.

Negotiation Tactic 1 – Rightsizing Commitments

One of the biggest pitfalls in cloud deals is overcommitting to more cloud spend than you actually need.

Microsoft might encourage a large commitment by painting a picture of rapid cloud growth, but you must rightsize your commitments to reality:

• Avoid overcommitment: Be conservative and realistic with your Azure consumption forecasts. It’s tempting to agree to a higher number when Microsoft dangles a bigger discount for a bigger commitment. However, any dollar of commitment you don’t end up using is basically wasted budget (often called “shelfware” cloud credits). Don’t let Microsoft’s rosy projections or internal optimism lead you to sign up for capacity you can’t consume. Validate Microsoft’s consumption estimates with your own data and growth plans – never accept their forecast without question. In an Azure contract negotiation, it’s far better to slightly under-commit and then grow the usage than to over-commit and fall short.
• Use phased or ramp-up commitments: A smart way to match commitment to actual adoption is negotiating a phased commitment structure. For example, if you expect your Azure use to grow over time, negotiate Year 1, Year 2, Year 3 spend levels instead of locking in the full run-rate from day one. Perhaps you commit $1M in the first year, $2M in the second, $3M in the third, rather than $3M every year straight away. This ramp-up approach means you’re only paying for what the business can realistically absorb at each stage. It also gives you a chance to re-evaluate after the first year or two. Microsoft often can accommodate ramp commits in an EA – you still guarantee a total over the term, but you aren’t front-loading the costs before you actually need them.
• Negotiate flexibility to reallocate spend: Ensure your Azure commitment isn’t too rigid in how it can be used. Ideally, your committed spend is a pool that can be applied to any Azure services or regions you need during the term. Verify that if your usage shifts (for instance, less into VMs but more into databases or AI services), you can still use your monetary commitment to cover that – and not forfeit anything. Similarly, if you operate in multiple regions, confirm that the commit is global or at least transferable, rather than tied to a region. During negotiation, ask for the right to reallocate unused commitments to different services or units. This might take the form of being able to adjust resource quantities periodically, or simply the assurance that Azure monetary credits can apply broadly. The more flexibility you have to move your cloud budget around, the less likely you’ll leave money on the table.

Rightsizing your commitments is all about aligning the deal with your actual cloud journey.

Microsoft ultimately wants you to consume as much as possible (since that’s revenue for them), but you need to protect your organization from overcommitting just to please Microsoft’s sales targets.

Start with a commitment you’re comfortable with, and build in options to expand later if needed – on your terms.

Negotiation Tactic 2 – Price Protection

Committing to spend on Azure over multiple years exposes you to the risk of price increases or changes in Microsoft’s pricing model.

Thus, a key negotiation tactic is securing price protection so that the great deal you sign today remains a great deal in years 2 and 3:

• Lock in unit rates: Whenever possible, negotiate to lock your Azure unit prices for the duration of the commitment (typically 3 years in an EA). Microsoft’s cloud price list can change – they might introduce higher rates for certain services or new pricing models. You want a guarantee that the unit rates (or at least the discounts) you negotiated won’t be eroded over time. For example, if you got a 20% discount on Azure compute, ensure that the discount level will apply throughout the term, even if list prices change. In some cases, you might even get Microsoft to agree to fixed specific rates for key services (e.g., $X per hour for a VM of type Y for three years). This shields you from surprise cost increases.
• Cap any price escalators (CPI-based uplifts): If Microsoft insists they can’t fully fix prices (they often cite things like inflation or exchange rates), then push for a cap on price increases. A common approach is to tie any annual price adjustments to a consumer price index (CPI) or a low fixed percentage. For instance, negotiate a clause that says Azure pricing will not increase more than, say, 3% per year or CPI inflation rate, whichever is lower. This way, even if Microsoft does a broad pricing update, your contract limits how much your costs can go up. Many customers have successfully included CPI-based caps on uplifts in their Azure deals, preventing the scenario of a 10% price jump that blows the budget. It’s about achieving predictability – knowing that your cloud costs won’t unexpectedly spike beyond a small, agreed amount.
• Extend discounted rates to additional usage: Another aspect of price protection is ensuring you can buy more at the same rate. Let’s say your cloud usage grows faster than expected and you exceed your committed spend – what price do you pay for that extra consumption? Ideally, any overage or additional Azure usage beyond your commitment should still receive your negotiated discount. Clarify this in the contract. Similarly, if you decide to increase your committed amount mid-term (because you truly need more capacity), negotiate that you can do so at the same discount percentage or better. You don’t want Microsoft saying, “Oh, you need another $1M of Azure? That will be at standard rates.” Lock in the advantage you negotiated. Essentially, your contract should state that the pricing terms (discounts, unit rates) apply to the committed volume and any incremental volume as well. This protects you as your cloud footprint grows.

By focusing on price protection in negotiations, you ensure that the savings you negotiate aren’t quietly taken back by Microsoft later.

It gives your CFO peace of mind that the cloud budget in year 3 will remain in line with the deal signed, aside from perhaps very minimal inflation adjustments.

Never assume that “standard” contract terms will protect you – explicitly ask for these protections.

Negotiation Tactic 3 – Flexibility & Exit Clauses

Microsoft’s standard agreements often lack flexibility if your circumstances change, but that doesn’t mean you can’t negotiate for it.

A truly buyer-friendly Azure commitment includes escape hatches and flexibility to adjust over time:

• Ability to shift unused spend: If you find mid-way through the contract that one project isn’t consuming as much Azure as expected, you should have the ability to repurpose that budget elsewhere. Negotiate the right to shift unused commits across services or departments. For example, if you allocated a portion of your budget to Azure analytics services but adoption is slow, you could use that budget for another Azure service that’s seeing more uptake. In practice, Azure monetary commitments are generally a single pool, but make sure there are no hidden restrictions. Clarify with Microsoft that you can apply your committed dollars to any Azure consumption (excluding perhaps third-party marketplace items) and that there are no penalties or approval needed to do so.
• Rollover of unused cloud credits: One of the biggest pain points is unused Azure credits at the end of a year (in an annual commit structure) or at the end of the contract term. By default, if you don’t use the full committed amount, those dollars expire – a pure loss for you. During negotiation, push for a rollover clause. This could mean that any unused commitment in Year 1 carries into Year 2, or that unused funds at the end of the term can be credited or refunded in some way. Microsoft might not readily agree to a refund, but they may allow a limited rollover (for instance, allowing up to 15% of unused funds to roll into the next year’s pool). Even better, see if you can structure the deal as a total commitment over 3 years without strict annual buckets, giving you the freedom to use the commitment over the term as needed. Anything that avoids the “use it or lose it” scenario will mitigate waste. It may require some tough negotiation, but if your Azure spend is substantial, Microsoft has conceded rollover provisions in some cases to secure the deal.
• Termination or downsize protections: While Microsoft would prefer you be locked in unconditionally, you should discuss exit clauses for worst-case scenarios. What if your business divests a division or faces an economic downturn and truly cannot use the originally planned Azure amount? Consider incorporating an option to downsize the commitment or terminate early with minimal penalty. This could be a contract clause that allows termination for convenience with a certain notice period and perhaps a cancellation fee that’s not ruinous. Or a clause that if your company undergoes a merger/acquisition or other significant change, you can renegotiate the Azure commitment. Microsoft might resist, but even partial protection is valuable. For example, negotiate the right to reduce the annual commitment by, say, 20% if by the second year you’re consistently under-consuming. At the very least, ensure there’s a renewal opt-out if they haven’t already built that in. The key is to avoid being completely handcuffed to an oversized contract if your cloud strategy or capacity needs shift dramatically.

Flexibility and exit terms are like an insurance policy.

You hope not to use them, but if you need them, you’ll be glad they’re in the contract. Raising these points also signals to Microsoft that you are a savvy customer planning for all scenarios, which may even make them more cautious about overselling you in the first place.

Negotiation Tactic 4 – Leverage Multi-Cloud

Microsoft knows that once a customer is all-in on Azure, switching costs are high, which can make some customers feel they have no choice.

To strengthen your hand, you should actively leverage multi-cloud options during negotiations.

Even if you’re primarily an Azure shop, making Microsoft believe you have alternatives will keep them on their toes.

• Use AWS and Google as bargaining chips: One of the oldest negotiation tactics in the book is introducing competition. Make it clear to Microsoft that you are also considering AWS, Google Cloud, or other cloud providers for your workloads. If Azure is not your only possible home, Microsoft will worry about losing your business. You don’t need to bluff unrealistically – even a partial move of certain projects to AWS/GCP could be plausible. Highlight areas where another provider might have an edge (pricing, specific capabilities, existing presence in your company). The goal is to create credible doubt that Microsoft has 100% of your cloud wallet locked. This often prompts Microsoft to counter with better pricing or incentives to ensure Azure looks more attractive than the alternative.
• Highlight credible alternatives: When you mention competitors, be as concrete as you can. For example, “Our architecture team is testing some workloads on AWS,” or “We’re evaluating GCP’s analytics platform for a new project.” Suppose Microsoft believes there is a real, immediate alternative in play. In that case, they are more likely to grant concessions such as extra discounts, free credits, or more flexible terms to sway the decision. You might even solicit a formal quote from AWS or Google for equivalent usage — having a number in hand (“Google would cost us $X for the same workload”) is powerful in negotiations. Microsoft has discretionary discount authority, and showing competitive numbers is one way to invoke it.
• Benefit even from partial multi-cloud moves: Even if, in reality, you plan to keep the majority of workloads on Azure, being open to a multi-cloud strategy can benefit you. You could, for instance, split new projects between clouds or maintain a contingency plan to migrate if needed. Let Microsoft know that you’re not entirely dependent on Azure — perhaps your CI/CD pipeline is cloud-agnostic, or your applications can run in containers that could be deployed elsewhere. The mere fact that you could migrate a portion relatively painlessly gives you leverage. Microsoft, not wanting to lose even a slice of your spend, may respond with a stronger commitment to your success (like architectural support or investment funding) and, of course, better pricing. In summary, always remind Microsoft that Azure is not the only game in town for you. Competition breeds the best offers.

Using multi-cloud leverage keeps the negotiation customer-centric. It forces Microsoft to earn your business by merit, not just inertia.

Even after the deal is signed, keeping an active multi-cloud strategy can be healthy to ensure Microsoft continues to treat you as a prized (and wooable) customer, rather than a captive one.

Hidden Risks to Watch

Aside from the headline terms like discounts and commitments, there are some hidden risks in Azure deals that buyers should watch for.

Microsoft’s proposals might gloss over these, so it’s on you to identify and mitigate them in the contract:

• Shelfware Cloud Credits: This refers to committed Azure funds that go unused – essentially, prepaid cloud budget that expires worthless. It happens when you overestimate your consumption or delays occur in projects. The risk is particularly high if you agreed to steep consumption forecasts. Unused commitment is wasted money. Mitigate this by rightsizing your commit (as discussed) and negotiating carry-over of unused credits, or at least flexibility to apply them elsewhere.
• FX and Regional Pricing Exposure: If your Azure deal spans multiple countries or currencies, be aware of foreign exchange risks and regional price variations. Microsoft periodically adjusts Azure pricing in local regions to stay in line with global USD rates – meaning your costs in, say, Europe could jump if the Euro weakens or if Microsoft decides on a worldwide price alignment. Without precautions, your budget could be thrown off by currency moves or a regional price hike. To counter this, negotiate price protection globally (e.g., caps on any currency-based price changes) or consider fixing your deal in a single currency if that makes sense. Also, ensure that the discounts you receive apply consistently across all regions, so that one region isn’t effectively paying more.
• Bundled Azure + M365 Lock-Ins: Microsoft often tries to bundle Azure commitments with other products like Microsoft 365 (M365), Dynamics, or security products in an Enterprise Agreement. While bundling can sometimes increase your discount, it can also create a lock-in scenario. For instance, you might get a better Azure rate only if you also commit to a certain number of M365 licenses. This ties your hands; if you later want to drop or reduce M365, your Azure deal could be affected (or vice versa). Be cautious of any cross-product dependencies in the contract. Ideally, negotiate Azure on its own merits. If bundles are offered, keep the terms for each component as separable as possible. Make sure that if you scale down one product, it doesn’t nullify discounts on another. Watch out for “all or nothing” clauses that force you to renew everything together or maintain a particular mix.

These hidden risks don’t always get the spotlight in negotiations, but they can bite you later.

Always read the fine print of how unused funds are treated, how currency and price adjustments work, and what happens if your overall Microsoft stack changes. Proactively addressing these in negotiation (via specific clauses and questions) will save headaches down the road.

Below is a summary of key Azure commitment risks and how to mitigate them:

Azure Commitment Risks & How to Mitigate

Checklist – Azure Negotiation Essentials

Before you finalize any Azure enterprise agreement negotiation or cloud commitment deal, run through this checklist of essentials to make sure you haven’t missed anything important:

• ✓ Benchmark your rates vs. peers. Know the market prices and ensure your effective rates are in line or better. Don’t take Microsoft’s word that you’re getting a “great deal” – verify it.
• ✓ Phase commitments to match adoption. Structure the deal so your commitment ramps up only as you actually deploy and use Azure. This prevents overcommitting early on.
• ✓ Lock pricing for 3 years (with a CPI cap). Secure fixed pricing or a very tight cap on any increases, so your cost per unit of Azure doesn’t inflate over the contract term.
• ✓ Demand rollover or reallocation rights. Make sure any unused commitment won’t be lost. Try to get the ability to carry forward unused credits or shift the budget to where it’s needed.
• ✓ Leverage AWS/GCP in negotiation. Keep Microsoft aware that you have alternatives. Use competitive pressure to obtain the best possible discount and terms.

This checklist captures the high-level must-haves in an Azure negotiation. If you can confidently check all of these off, you’re in a strong position to sign a deal that is cost-effective and flexible.

Related articles

• Reserved Instances & Savings Plans: Maximizing Azure Discounts
• Preventing Azure Overruns: Negotiating Caps and Flexibility
• Azure Consumption Commitments: Finding the Right Level
• Hybrid Use Benefits: Leveraging On-Prem Licenses in Azure
• Azure Cost Analytics: Data to Strengthen Your Negotiation

FAQs

Can we negotiate Azure pricing without an EA?
Yes, you can absolutely negotiate Azure pricing even if you don’t go with a full Enterprise Agreement. Microsoft’s Microsoft Customer Agreement (MCA) and even CSP channels allow for custom terms when the spend is substantial. For instance, under an MCA, you might negotiate a tiered discount if you expect significant growth, without a multi-year lock-in. However, keep in mind that the largest discounts typically come with an EA because of the committed volume. If your Azure spend is smaller or you need month-to-month flexibility, you might use MCA or CSP and still ask for improved pricing (especially through a CSP reseller who might cut their margins). In short, an EA is not the only path – it’s about your leverage (spend size, competitive options) regardless of contract vehicle.

What’s a realistic discount for a $5M+ Azure commit?
For a multi-million dollar annual Azure commitment, it’s realistic to expect a significant discount off the pay-as-you-go rates. Many organizations with spending in the $5M per year range might secure on the order of 20% or more in discounts. With skillful negotiation (and if the deal is competitive), discounts in the 25–30% range are not unheard of for very large deals. Microsoft likely has an internal threshold on how far they can go, and pushing towards the upper end may require strong justification (like an AWS alternative quote or bundling other Microsoft products). Remember that the exact discount will depend on the mix of services (some services have less margin) and the length of commitment. Still, if you’re committing that level of spend, you should certainly be getting well into double-digit percentage off the list prices.

Do unused Azure credits expire?
By default, yes. If you have an Azure monetary commitment (prepaid Azure funds in an EA), any unused portion typically expires at the end of the year or end of the term (depending on how the deal is structured). It’s usually a “use it or lose it” scenario for each year’s commitment in an EA. Unused credits don’t carry over automatically to the next period unless you’ve negotiated a special provision. This is why it’s crucial to negotiate rollover rights or at least align your commitment closely with expected usage. In a pay-as-you-go model (MCA or CSP), you’re only paying for what you use, so there are no “credits” to expire – you just have to watch out for any minimums or commitments you agreed to. Always clarify with Microsoft how unused commit is handled: if the answer is that they expire annually, consider pushing back on that in the contract.

Is an MCA better than an EA for flexibility?
For pure flexibility, the Microsoft Customer Agreement (MCA) is generally more flexible than an EA. MCAs operate with no long-term obligation – you can scale your usage up or down and only pay for what you use. This is great if you expect variable usage or are not ready to commit to a fixed spend. In contrast, an EA locks you into a set spend over 3 years (even if it’s broken into annual commits, you’re still on the hook for the total). However, an EA can be better for cost predictability and discounts. It really depends on your situation: if your priority is flexibility and avoiding any commitment, an MCA is attractive. If your priority is the deepest discount and you can reasonably forecast usage, an EA might yield better pricing. Some companies start with an MCA to get their feet wet in Azure and then move to an EA once their spend grows and usage stabilizes. Others might use an EA for core steady workloads and keep some overflow or experimental workloads on MCA/CSP for flexibility. The good news is you don’t have to choose one or the other for everything – you could use a mix (though that adds complexity). Evaluate your need for flexibility versus savings, and remember that even in an EA, you can negotiate some flexibility clauses as we discussed.

How do we handle FX exposure in multi-region deployments?
Handling foreign exchange (FX) exposure in a multi-region Azure deployment is an important consideration. If you’re paying Azure bills in multiple currencies (for example, paying in EUR for European resources and USD for US resources), currency fluctuations can make your costs unpredictable. One strategy is to consolidate your Azure agreement in a single currency, if possible – for instance, having all billing in USD – but this might not always align with local entity needs and could introduce its own complexities. Another approach is to negotiate a currency protection clause: ask Microsoft to fix exchange rates or limit price adjustments in foreign currencies for the term. Microsoft has been known to adjust international pricing to account for FX, but you can attempt to cap those adjustments. You might also consider financial hedging outside the contract if the exposure is significant (though that’s more of a treasury solution). Also, keep an eye on Azure announcements: Microsoft sometimes gives notice of regional price increases (which are often FX-driven). If you see one coming, you could pre-buy some Azure credits or increase usage before the hike (if under an MCA) to get the old rate. In summary, bring up the FX concern with Microsoft – even if they won’t eliminate the risk, just being aware of it can help you plan or negotiate a buffer in your budget for potential FX-related cost changes.

Five Expert Recommendations

To wrap up, here are five expert recommendations to remember when negotiating Azure and cloud spend commitments:

1. Always validate Microsoft’s consumption forecasts. Never accept Microsoft’s projected Azure usage at face value. Do your own analysis of how much cloud you truly need. This prevents you from signing up for an inflated commitment that Microsoft “suggested” without data to back it.
2. Push for rollover and reallocation rights. Insist on the ability to carry forward unused funds or repurpose them, and to shift spend across services. This ensures you won’t pay for cloud capacity that ends up unused (no more shelfware in the cloud!).
3. Secure caps on price increases (inflation protection). Don’t let unforeseen price hikes undermine a multi-year deal. Tie any potential price increases to a reasonable metric like CPI, or eliminate them, so you maintain your savings over the long haul.
4. Benchmark against your peers before committing. Go into negotiations armed with knowledge of what similar organizations are paying for Azure. This external perspective empowers you to demand a fair deal and not be shy about asking Microsoft to match industry-standard discounts.
5. Leverage competitive cloud options. Even if you intend to stick with Azure, make sure Microsoft knows that AWS, Google Cloud, or others are viable alternatives on your radar. This competitive pressure is often the single strongest factor in pushing Microsoft to give you the best combination of price and terms.

By following these recommendations, you’ll approach your Azure contract renewal or new cloud commitment with a strategic, informed mindset. The result should be a more optimized cloud spend with the flexibility to adapt as your needs evolve – and a deal where you, not Microsoft, set the tone and terms. Happy negotiating!

Read about our Microsoft Negotiation Services

Do you want to speak with us about our Microsoft Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit