The “True-Up” Trap: Avoiding Surprises in Microsoft EA True-Up Costs

The “True-Up” Trap: Avoiding Surprises in Microsoft EA True-Up Costs

Introduction – Why True-Ups Catch Enterprises Off Guard

Microsoft Enterprise Agreements (EAs) include a yearly ritual known as the “true-up.”

This process involves reconciling your software license counts with actual usage. In theory, it sounds straightforward, but in practice, many enterprises treat true-ups as a back-office formality – until a hefty true-up cost surprise arrives from Microsoft.

Too often, IT and procurement teams underestimate growth or new deployments during the year.

When the annual reconciliation comes due, they’re caught off guard by an unbudgeted bill in the six or seven figures. For a full overview of what pitfalls to watch out for, read our guide to Avoiding Common Microsoft EA Renewal Pitfalls.

Why does this happen? One reason is that Microsoft sales reps sometimes downplay immediate costs by saying things like, “Don’t worry about adding those licenses now; you can always true-up later.”

By deferring costs to a future true-up, organizations can lull themselves into a false sense of security. Come year-end, though, unexpected true-up fees can blow a hole in the IT budget. In short, the “true-up trap” refers to a common pitfall: enterprises that do not pay close attention throughout the year and then face surprise Microsoft true-up bills.

This guide offers a cautionary look at why true-ups can be risky and, more importantly, guides how to manage them strategically to avoid unpleasant surprises.

What Is a True-Up?

In simple terms, a true-up is the annual process of reporting any additional licenses, users, or installations you’ve added during the year under your Microsoft EA, and paying for those extras retroactively.

When you sign a Microsoft EA, you commit to a certain number of licenses (for products like Windows, Office 365, servers, etc.) at the start.

Over the course of the year, your organization might grow or enable new software.

The true-up is when you officially reconcile these changes: you inform Microsoft of any increases in usage and purchase the necessary additional licenses to cover that usage.

For example, if you started the year with 1,000 Office 365 licenses and ended up deploying 100 more for new employees, the true-up is when you true up those 100 extra licenses. Microsoft will bill you (often at the pre-agreed contract price) for the period those 100 were in use.

The key thing to remember is that under the EA, you’re obligated to pay for anything you’ve deployed, regardless of intent or duration.

Even if those extra deployments were unplanned or meant to be temporary, they count. There’s generally no negotiating the fact that you must pay – an EA’s terms make true-ups a contractual obligation to stay compliant. (While you sometimes can reduce certain subscriptions at an anniversary if your contract allows, in most cases, you cannot “true-down” until the EA term ends.)

In summary, a true-up is the yearly true-or-false test of your license compliance: if you used more than you bought, you have to settle the bill.

Don’t walk into this, The Verbal Promise Trap: Why You Must Get Everything in Writing in Microsoft EA Negotiations.

Why the True-Up Becomes a Trap

If true-ups are expected, why do they so often become a trap for enterprises?

The problem is usually complacency and timing. Many companies treat the true-up as an afterthought, something to deal with at year-end, rather than a continuous management concern.

This leads to a few common issues:

• Sticker Shock: It’s easy to ignore growing usage month-to-month. But at the end of the year, all those incremental additions turn into one large, scary number. A company that casually adds accounts or enables new features can end up with a shockingly large retroactive bill. This sticker shock is the hallmark of the true-up trap: licensing costs that seemingly come out of nowhere because they weren’t tracked in real time.
• Upsell Leverage: Microsoft’s account teams are well aware of the true-up dynamic. In some cases, they might even encourage a lax approach mid-term (“Sure, go ahead and deploy that, we’ll sort out licenses in the true-up”) because they know it can lead to revenue later. Once you’ve deployed over your initial entitlement, the vendor has the upper hand. The true-up becomes an upsell opportunity: “You already deployed more; let’s raise your baseline” is a message many procurement leads have heard. In other words, if you’ve outgrown your contracted licenses, Microsoft may push to adjust your agreement (often at a higher cost or into more premium products) since you’ve demonstrated the need. You end up trapped in spending more, with little negotiating leverage, because the usage has already happened.
• Budget Misalignment: True-ups often hit at an awkward time. They’re due before the EA anniversary (often 30 days prior), which might not align with your fiscal budget cycle. If you haven’t planned for it, a large true-up payment can disrupt budgets and require scrambling for funds. Finance leaders hate surprises – a true-up trap can strain the relationship between IT and finance when an unplanned expense lands on their desk late in the year.
• Compliance Creep: Some organizations mistakenly think that if they don’t report something in a true-up, they might save money. In reality, under-reporting usage or delaying true-up payments only creates compliance risks. Microsoft can audit customers, and if they find you deployed software without paying for it, the penalties and back-charges will far exceed the original cost. So a casual attitude (“we’ll deal with it later”) can snowball into a compliance trap, where the company is not only paying more but also potentially violating contract terms.

In essence, the true-up process becomes a trap when it’s not managed proactively.

It’s not the concept of true-up that’s bad – it’s the lack of visibility and planning around it. Below, we’ll examine some common scenarios where enterprises fall into the true-up trap and the risks each scenario carries.

Common True-Up Scenarios & Risks

One way to understand the true-up trap is to examine real-world scenarios that frequently cause issues.

Here are some common situations that lead to unexpected true-up costs, along with the risks they pose:

As the table shows, each scenario can catch you off guard in a different way.

Rapid growth or M&A means more people and devices to license (and a bigger bill). Feature creep means you might be unknowingly using products you haven’t paid for.

And rapid cloud adoption can mean your spend outpaces the contract terms. All of these result in one thing: an unexpectedly large check to write at true-up time.

The best way to reduce costs is Shelfware in Microsoft EAs: Identifying and Eliminating Over-Licensing.

How to Avoid True-Up Pitfalls

Avoiding the true-up trap hinges on proactive management and savvy negotiation. Here are some key strategies to keep true-ups from derailing your budget:

Plan for Growth

Don’t wait for the true-up to account for growth you can foresee. If you expect your organization to expand (new hires, acquisitions, new projects), plan for it in your EA upfront.

This could involve negotiating additional license quantities upfront or incorporating flexibility for anticipated increases. Often, it’s cheaper to buy a block of licenses in advance at a discount than to pay later at true-up time, when you’ll be paying retroactively (often at less favorable rates).

For example, if you know you’ll likely add 200 employees next year, see if you can negotiate those licenses now at a better unit price. This way, you avoid paying full fare for them mid-term.

The goal is to bake expected growth into your agreement so that it doesn’t come back as an expensive surprise. Essentially, treat licensing like capacity planning: anticipate needs and secure a good price ahead of time.

Cap True-Up Costs

One powerful negotiation tactic is to put a ceiling on your true-up expenses before they happen. You can negotiate terms in your EA that fix the pricing for any mid-term additions or cap how much those additions can cost.

For instance, insist that any new licenses you add via true-up will be priced at the same rate as your initial licenses (or with the same discount percentage off list price).

This prevents Microsoft from charging you a higher “then-current” price if their prices increase or if you move into a higher pricing tier.

Some customers even negotiate a cap like “any true-up quantity up to X% above our baseline will honor the original discount.” The idea is to eliminate surprises: you know the maximum unit cost (or total cost) of expanding during the term.

By securing pre-agreed unit pricing for true-ups, you neutralize one of Microsoft’s potential gotchas. If Microsoft’s standard terms would make added licenses more expensive later, negotiating a cap or fixed rate ensures price hikes on those additions won’t blindside you.

Monitor Quarterly, Not Annually

A year is a long time in IT, and waiting 12 months to assess license usage is a recipe for surprises. Instead, run your own internal “mini true-ups” on a quarterly (or even monthly) basis. This means regularly checking how many licenses are in use versus what you’ve contracted.

If you notice that certain counts are creeping up, you have time to respond. Proactive adjustments could include purchasing additional licenses mid-year to spread out costs (or to lock in pricing if you suspect a price increase is coming), or curbing unnecessary deployments before they balloon.

Quarterly monitoring also helps you catch errors or inefficiencies – for example, you might discover 50 unused licenses that you can re-harvest for new users, avoiding a needless purchase later.

By treating the true-up as a continuous process, you’ll ensure there are no big surprises at year-end.

Moreover, bringing transparency to license usage each quarter means your finance team can be kept in the loop, so any growth is budgeted rather than coming as a shock in one big lump sum.

Use True-Ups as Renewal Leverage

If, despite your best efforts, you end up with a large true-up, you can still turn that situation to your advantage during your next EA renewal.

Think of a hefty true-up bill as a signal that your needs have grown – and use that fact as bargaining leverage. Rather than simply paying a massive true-up invoice outright, you could approach Microsoft with a proposition: fold those additional licenses (and their cost) into a renewal or a new three-year agreement, ideally with a discount applied.

Essentially, you’re telling Microsoft, “We’ll commit to these higher numbers going forward, but give us a better rate or concessions in return.” Microsoft, eager to secure your renewal, might be willing to treat your true-up as part of the larger deal, which can mean discounts or bonus services to sweeten the pot.

The key is not to treat the true-up as an isolated expense, but as part of your overall negotiation strategy.

When a true-up is especially large, it’s evidence that you’re a growing (and valuable) customer – use that to negotiate a more favorable agreement rather than writing a blank check. In the end, the goal is to never let a big true-up go to waste: leverage it to improve your terms moving forward.

Address Compliance Risks

True-ups aren’t just about money – they’re also about staying on the right side of your license agreements. Many software compliance audits (including Microsoft’s) are triggered by inconsistent or poor true-up practices. To avoid this risk, make compliance a cornerstone of your true-up process.

Ensure you have clear internal policies on tracking deployments and reporting usage.

It may be wise to perform internal compliance checks before each true-up submission: verify that all deployed software is accounted for and properly licensed. If you find anything unlicensed, address it proactively in the true-up rather than hoping Microsoft won’t notice.

Additionally, consider negotiating contractual safeguards: for example, if you are worried about unintentionally over-deploying a certain product, discuss a clause or flexibility with Microsoft in advance.

Remember that failing to report or under-reporting is a serious breach. Microsoft’s rule is simple: if you use it, you need to pay for it. If you don’t, and an audit finds out, you could face back payments at full list price, true-up fees, and penalties that make any “savings” vanish quickly. By rigorously managing compliance and being transparent (to the extent required) with Microsoft about your usage, you also build trust.

That trust can pay off by possibly reducing the likelihood of a formal audit, or at least making any audit a routine check instead of a firefight.

In short, treat true-up time as a self-audit time – catch and fix compliance issues internally, and you’ll reduce your exposure to external audits and fines.

Red Flags in True-Up Discussions

How can you tell if you’re walking into a true-up trap during your Microsoft negotiations? Listen carefully to the language and assurances given by Microsoft’s reps or resellers. Certain phrases should raise immediate red flags and prompt you to get more clarity (in writing!) or negotiate protections.

For example, if you hear someone say, “Don’t worry about it now, you can just true-up later,” take that as a warning. It might sound convenient, but “true-up later” can translate to “pay more, when you have no choice.” At a minimum, your response should be to ask: “At what cost will we true-up later? Let’s set that now.”

Similarly, “We’ll sort it out at year-end” is a dangerous promise. Sorting it out later often means you have little leverage and are stuck paying whatever the contract dictates.

A savvy procurement or IT manager should counter that kind of talk by pressing for specifics: sort out exactly how it will be handled, capped, or priced, upfront.

Any attempt to gloss over true-up details or push them off to the future is a sign you need to dig deeper.

Don’t let anyone make the true-up sound like a non-issue – insist on understanding the worst-case scenario costs and put guardrails in place.

An expert tip: whenever a sales rep downplays a licensing detail by saying “we’ll handle it later,” that’s your cue to get it nailed down in the contract now. In essence, vague assurances are red flags – clear, written terms should govern true-ups so there are no nasty surprises down the road.

Five Expert Recommendations

Finally, to wrap up, here are five concise recommendations from a Microsoft licensing negotiation expert on avoiding the true-up trap:

1. Make true-ups a strategic focus, not just paperwork: Don’t relegate true-up management to a trivial task. Treat it as a key driver of your software spend, deserving regular attention and executive visibility.
2. Negotiate price protections for additions: Always seek to cap or fix the cost of mid-term license additions in your EA. Never leave true-up pricing to chance – lock in those rates or limits during your negotiation so growth doesn’t equal gouging.
3. Audit and adjust quarterly: Perform internal license audits every quarter. By doing so, you can catch up with usage trends, reclaim idle licenses, and prevent a year-end pileup. Steady vigilance beats last-minute panic.
4. Leverage true-ups in negotiations: If you do end up facing a large true-up, use it as a talking point in your Microsoft renewal or next deal. Roll those needs into a new agreement with better discounts, instead of paying a giant bill without any strategic benefit.
5. Integrate compliance into the process: Use the true-up as an opportunity to run compliance checks. This involves verifying every deployment and resolving any internal issues. A clean true-up process not only avoids extra fees but also keeps you prepared and protected in case of an audit.

By following these recommendations, you can turn the Microsoft EA true-up from a yearly “gotcha” into a predictable, manageable aspect of your IT strategy.

The true-up doesn’t have to be a trap – with the right approach, it becomes just another routine (and controlled) part of doing business with Microsoft.

Read about our Microsoft EA Optimization Service.

Do you want to know more about our Microsoft Optimization Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit