Unified Support Pricing 101: Understand Your Cost Drivers

Unified Support Pricing Demystified

Microsoft’s Unified Support model has become the default support offering for enterprise customers – and it’s often a source of sticker shock. This new model replaced the old Premier Support, fundamentally changing how support is priced and delivered.

For CIOs, procurement leads, and IT vendor managers in 2025, understanding Unified Support’s pricing is crucial. Why? Because support costs are rising fast, and they’re now tied directly to your Microsoft spend rather than how much help you actually use.

In this section, we’ll demystify what Unified Support is, why it matters today, and how its pricing works so that you can prepare for your next renewal with eyes wide open.

Read our complete guide to Negotiating Microsoft Unified Support Agreements.

Why Unified Support Matters in 2025

In recent years, Microsoft has fully transitioned from Premier Support to Unified Support. If your organization previously relied on Premier (buying a block of support hours), you’ve likely been pushed onto Unified Support by now.

In 2025, Unified Support matters because:

• Rising Costs: Enterprises are facing significantly higher support bills under Unified Support. Many report that what used to cost a few hundred thousand dollars under Premier can now run into the millions with Unified. This jump can catch organizations off guard, especially if they haven’t increased their support usage.
• Cloud Expansion: The continued growth of cloud services like Azure and Microsoft 365 means your overall Microsoft spending keeps rising. Unified Support fees scale with that spend, so as you adopt more cloud, your support fees automatically increase (even if you don’t open more support tickets).
• No Going Back: Microsoft has phased out Premier Support in most regions. By 2025, Unified Support is the standard. Enterprises have little choice but to engage with this model or seek alternatives. This makes it all the more important to understand Unified Support’s nuances and negotiate wisely.
• Budget Impact: For CIOs and IT leaders, support is now a big line item in the IT budget. You need to justify these costs internally. Knowing what drives Unified Support fees (and how to control them) can mean the difference between an acceptable IT budget and an overrun.
• Renewal Pressure: Microsoft typically tries to upsell and lock in multi-year support agreements. If you go into a renewal discussion without clarity on the pricing model, you could end up over-committing. Understanding Unified Support in 2025 helps you push back and ensure you only pay for what you truly need.

In short, Unified Support is front-and-center now. Its costs are higher and rising, and it’s intertwined with your organization’s Microsoft strategy. Being skeptical and asking tough questions about the pricing model is not just okay – it’s necessary to protect your budget.

How the Microsoft Unified Support Pricing Model Works

Unified Support pricing is very different from the old hourly support model. Here’s how it works:

• Spend-Based Fee: Microsoft charges a support fee calculated as a percentage of your total annual Microsoft spend. This includes all your Microsoft purchases: on-premises licenses, Office 365 subscriptions, Azure consumption, Dynamics 365, and even Software Assurance investments. The more you spend on Microsoft products/services, the higher your support fee. In effect, support is a “tax” on your Microsoft investment.
• “Unlimited” Incidents: In return for this fee, Microsoft promises unlimited support cases. Unlike Premier (where you bought a fixed number of hours or incidents), Unified Support lets you open as many support tickets as needed without worrying about running out. This is positioned as a key value: peace of mind that you can always get help. However, this “all-you-can-eat” approach comes at a steep price, especially if you traditionally didn’t use many support hours.
• Tiered Service Levels: Unified Support is offered in three tiers – Core, Advanced, and Performance – each with a different percentage rate and set of services.
  • Core is the entry-level (lowest cost percentage). It provides basic reactive support (typically during business hours only), access to self-service resources, and a limited number of training materials. It’s designed for organizations with less complex needs.
  • Advanced (mid-tier) costs a higher percentage of spend. It includes faster response times, 24/7 support for critical issues, a designated Technical Account Manager (TAM) who is familiar with your environment, and some proactive services, such as health checks or advisory hours.
  • Performance is the premium tier (highest percentage). It offers the fastest response (often within 30 minutes for critical issues), 24/7 coverage for all issues, dedicated support engineers (who may be on-site or aligned to your account), and a broad range of proactive services, including customized workshops and in-depth reviews. This is meant for large enterprises where any downtime is mission-critical.
• Percentage of Spend Ranges: While exact rates are negotiated, the Core tier typically ranges around 6–8% of your Microsoft spend, the Advanced tier around 8–10%, and the Performance tier around 10–12%. For example, if you spend $10 million per year on Microsoft software and cloud, a Core support fee might be roughly $700k (if 7%), Advanced $900k, and Performance $1.1M+. These are ballpark figures – Microsoft often applies different percentages to different portions of your spend (license vs cloud). It may offer discounts for very large spend levels or multi-year commitments.
• All-Inclusive (Mostly): Unified Support bundles in a lot of extras by default. Proactive services (planning workshops, training sessions, system assessments) are included in the package, especially at Advanced and Performance tiers. You also get account management (TAM support) at those higher tiers. The idea is a one-stop support model covering break-fix, advisory, and escalation management. However, some specialized services (like a dedicated onsite engineer or certain in-depth consulting engagements) might still cost extra or have limits, even in Unified Support.
• Annual Uplifts: Because the fee is tied to spend, if your Microsoft spend increases year-over-year, your support cost increases proportionally. Even if your spend stays flat, many organizations see built-in year-over-year price increases. For instance, if Microsoft gave you a discount or used some credits in the first year to soften the blow when moving from Premier, those breaks often disappear by year two. It’s not uncommon to see the Unified Support fee jump 10% or more annually if unchecked.

In summary, the Unified Support pricing model is easy for Microsoft to calculate and hard for customers to control. It offers simplicity (one fee covers all support needs) but at the expense of flexibility. You’re paying a premium for unlimited access, whether you use that access fully or not.

Key Cost Drivers in Unified Support

What actually drives the cost of Unified Support? Several factors play a role, and understanding them will help you identify why your quote is what it is (and where you might have leverage to adjust it).

The major cost drivers include:

• Overall Microsoft Licensing & Cloud Spend: Your total Microsoft spend is the baseline. Unified Support is essentially a percentage of this number. If you have a large Enterprise Agreement, many Office 365 licenses, or significant Azure consumption, expect a high support fee. For example, an organization spending $50 million a year on Microsoft products might easily see a support quote in the several millions. The single biggest driver is how much you spend on Microsoft – the more you spend, the more support costs.
• Support Tier Selection (Core vs. Advanced vs. Performance): The tier you choose greatly affects the percentage (and thus the fee). Higher tiers deliver more services and faster response, but they come with a higher cost percentage. Selecting Advanced or Performance can increase your fee by 20-50%+ compared to the Core tier. It’s important to evaluate if your business truly needs the extras in the higher tiers. For instance, do you need a 30-minute response and a named engineer (Performance), or would a 1-hour response with a TAM (Advanced) suffice? Choosing a tier beyond your actual needs will drive up costs unnecessarily.
• Cloud Consumption Growth: Unified Support charges include your Azure and Microsoft 365 usage. If you plan significant growth in cloud services, your support costs will automatically rise in tandem. This is a hidden cost driver – a big migration to Azure or an increase in users/licenses doesn’t just increase your Microsoft bill, it also hikes your support fee at renewal. Companies that undergo rapid cloud expansion often experience significant jumps in support costs year over year. Keeping cloud spend optimized (or negotiating a cap on support fees) is critical to manage this.
• Global vs. Regional Coverage Scope: Unified Support often covers your entire organization under one umbrella. If you include multiple subsidiaries, international divisions, or additional affiliates in the support agreement, that increases the total Microsoft spend counted toward the fee. A global Unified Support deal covering all regions will cost more than a narrower scope. Some enterprises choose to include only critical business units to control costs. In short, the broader the coverage, the higher the spend base – and thus the higher the fee.
• Hidden Premium Services and Add-Ons: While Unified Support is sold as all-inclusive, there are premium options that can sneak in. For example, suppose you want a Designated Support Engineer (DSE) assigned to your account (beyond the standard pool), or a specific 15-minute response SLA for all tickets, or extensive on-site training workshops. In that case, these often incur additional costs or require the highest tiers. Microsoft might bundle some of these into your quote if you showed interest. These premium services act as cost multipliers. It’s important to review what exactly is included in your support package – you may find costly extras (like extra training days, enhanced SLAs, or “Mission Critical” add-ons) that you could remove to save money if they aren’t essential.

Understanding these drivers helps you see where you might have room to maneuver.

For instance, if your support cost shot up primarily because your Azure spend doubled, you might explore separating Azure support (using a standalone Azure support plan) or negotiating a different approach for that portion.

Or if you’re on the Performance tier but realize you haven’t utilized the proactive services that come with it, you might consider downgrading to the Advanced tier at renewal. Always break down your Unified Support quote to see which factors are contributing the most to the cost.

Unified Support vs Premier Support – Cost Differences

It’s important to compare Unified Support with the legacy Premier Support model to grasp how the economics have changed.

Premier Support was the long-standing model, where you purchased a certain amount of support in advance (typically a block of hours for reactive support, plus additional hours for proactive services). Unified Support, in contrast, charges a percentage of your Microsoft spend for unlimited support.

Here are the key cost differences and what they mean:

• Pricing Structure: Premier was a pay-per-use model. You paid for a specific number of support hours or incidents (for example, 500 hours of support time). If you used fewer hours, you might have some left over (or you could sometimes carry them forward or just waste them). If you needed more, you had to purchase more hours. This made Premier costs somewhat predictable and controllable – if you knew your typical support usage, you could budget accordingly. Unified is a fixed-fee model tied to spend. You pay a set fee regardless of whether you use support or not. It’s predictable in the sense that you know the fee upfront for the year, but it’s not tied at all to your actual usage.
• Cost Levels: Generally, Unified Support is more expensive for most customers. Under Premier, if your support needs were modest, you could keep costs low by only buying the hours you needed (maybe a $200K or $500K annual contract, depending on your environment). Under Unified, even if you hardly open tickets, you might be quoted a million dollars or more simply due to your Microsoft license footprint. Many organizations saw a 2x, 3x, or even higher increase in annual support costs when moving to Unified. If you had a very high support usage (lots of incidents, many hours), Unified might, in theory, provide better value (no overage charges). But in practice, Microsoft priced Unified such that even heavy Premier users often pay more under Unified.
• Value and Waste: With Premier, you only paid for what you needed. If you never used a certain proactive service, you simply wouldn’t buy those hours next time. With Unified, you’re paying for a bundle of services (reactive and proactive) whether you use them or not. If your organization doesn’t take full advantage of, say, the included training days or planning workshops, that value is effectively lost. This is why some customers feel Unified is “wasteful” – unless you consume everything it includes, you’re subsidizing unused services.
• Example Scenario: Imagine a company that previously spent $300K per year on Premier Support for a certain number of hours. This might have sufficed if they had, say, 50 incidents a year and some proactive work. Now, that same company under Unified might be asked to pay, for example, $1 million (because their Microsoft spend is large). Unless their incident volume has grown dramatically, they are paying over three times more for roughly the same actual support utilization. They do get the ability to call Microsoft unlimited times and some extra benefits, but if they continue to only open 50 cases a year, the cost per support incident skyrockets under Unified.
• Cost-Effectiveness by Usage Pattern: If your organization rarely calls Microsoft support (low ticket volume, stable environment), Premier was far more cost-effective – you could “right-size” your support hours purchase. For these organizations, Unified Support feels overpriced. On the other hand, if you have a very high volume of issues or you absolutely require immediate, around-the-clock attention for critical systems, Unified’s unlimited model ensures you won’t run out of support. It’s essentially pre-paying a premium for peace of mind and broad coverage. In cases of truly constant support needs, Unified might be easier than constantly managing hour consumption under Premier (and perhaps cheaper than buying an enormous block of Premier hours). But such cases are the exception, not the rule.
• Negotiation and Flexibility: Premier allows flexibility, such as carrying over unused hours (in some cases), purchasing additional hours mid-year if needed, or scaling down next year if usage is overestimated. Unified locks you in for the year (or multi-year). There’s little flexibility to reduce scope mid-term if you over-bought. Negotiation for discounts is possible in both models, but Premier negotiation was about the pricing of hours, whereas Unified negotiation is about tweaking the percentage or capping increases. Many customers miss the transparency of Premier’s model – it was easier to understand what you were paying for.

Overall, Unified Support tends to cost more and feels less directly tied to value received, especially for organizations with moderate support needs.

Microsoft pitches the “unlimited support and comprehensive services” as a value-add, but savvy customers remain cautious, making sure those extras justify the added cost.

Typical Pricing Scenarios: Premier vs Unified (Table)

To put things into perspective, let’s consider a hypothetical enterprise scenario and compare Premier vs Unified costs side by side. Suppose an enterprise has an annual Microsoft spend of $50 million (on various licenses and Azure).

Under Unified Support, their fees will be based on the spend. Under Premier, their costs would depend on how many support hours they might need.

Below is a simplified comparison:

Assumptions:

The numbers above use rough percentage estimates for illustration. Actual quotes could vary. In this scenario, under Premier, the company might have spent around $600K if its usage was moderate (for example, a few hundred hours of support).

Under Unified, even the basic Core tier costs multiples of that. The Advanced and Performance tiers increase support costs even further.

What this shows:

For a large Microsoft spend, Unified Support can easily become a multi-million-dollar annual expense. Premier support costs did not automatically scale with how much software you owned – they scaled with usage.

A company could have $50M of Microsoft technology, but spend only $500 on support if they rarely need help.

Unified flips that: with $50M of Microsoft investment, Microsoft assumes you should pay a sizeable percentage for support, no matter what.

This is why budget-conscious organizations carefully consider which Unified tier they truly need and how to negotiate that percentage down.

Common Pitfalls That Inflate Unified Support Fees

Unified Support’s model is complex, and many customers unwittingly make choices (or omissions) that lead to higher fees than necessary.

Here are some common pitfalls that can drive your Unified Support costs up:

• Auto-Escalation to Higher Tiers: Microsoft reps may recommend a higher tier (Advanced or Performance) even if you started with Core, especially if you had a few critical incidents or want a certain feature. Be wary of automatically accepting an upgrade in tier. The jump from Core to Advanced or Advanced to Performance can be a huge price increase. Sometimes, Microsoft will push you to a higher tier if your spend crosses a certain threshold or if you have any complaint about response times. Before agreeing, evaluate if you truly need that tier’s benefits year-round.
• Paying for Unused Advanced Features: Many organizations on Advanced or Performance don’t fully utilize the proactive services, training days, or workshops included. These features are baked into the price. If you don’t schedule those architecture reviews or use the allotted training, you’re effectively overpaying. It’s a pitfall to pay for premium services “just in case” and then never use them. Track your utilization – if you see a low uptake of proactive benefits, consider whether a lower tier (or a different support strategy) would suffice.
• Bundling Extras You Didn’t Negotiate: At times, Unified Support quotes include add-ons that weren’t explicitly requested. For example, Microsoft might bundle a certain number of onsite support visits, or an enhanced SLA, or credits for other services. These “extras” often come with a cost, even if they’re not itemized. If you didn’t discuss them but see your quote is higher than expected, ask for a breakdown. You may be paying for something you didn’t really need. Always unbundle the quote – you may find optional services that can be removed to trim the fee.
• Failing to Align Support Tier to Actual Ticket History: Perhaps the biggest pitfall is not basing your support level on real data. Some companies simply accept Microsoft’s recommendation or go with a top-tier out of fear, without analyzing their own support case history. If you historically only log, say, 20 support cases a year and none are Sev A middle-of-the-night emergencies, do you really need the Performance tier? Over-tiering is a costly mistake. Your support contract should reflect your actual usage and critical needs. If not, you’ll be overpaying for capacity and speed you don’t use.
• Letting Contracts Renew on Autopilot: (Related to negotiation, but a pitfall nonetheless.) Microsoft will happily renew your Unified Support with a standard increase if you don’t actively push back. Many organizations have seen 10–20% jumps at renewal because they didn’t start negotiations early or review changes. Never assume it will stay the same – always scrutinize the renewal quote. Increases can often be mitigated if caught and challenged, but if you sign an auto-renew, you’re locking in potentially inflated costs.

Avoiding these pitfalls comes down to being proactive: review your usage, question every component of the offer, and don’t assume Microsoft’s default proposal is the best fit for you. A skeptical, data-driven approach can save hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Checklist – How to Analyze Your Unified Support Cost Drivers

Before your next Unified Support renewal or negotiation, it’s wise to perform a thorough analysis of what’s driving your support costs.

Use the following checklist to ensure you cover all the bases:

• Gather your support ticket data for the past 1-2 years. Record how many support incidents you raised with Microsoft, their severity, and how often you truly needed 24/7 immediate assistance. This gives you a fact-based view of your support consumption.
• Map support tier features to your business needs. List which Unified Support features you actually use or value. For example, do you require a dedicated Technical Account Manager? Have you utilized those proactive workshops? If your business operates mostly 9-5, is 24/7 support critical or just “nice to have”? Align the tier to what you genuinely need.
• Forecast your Microsoft spend and cloud growth. Work with your finance or cloud teams to project how your Azure consumption or license counts will grow in the next couple of years. If you anticipate a 20% Azure uptake, expect a similar 20% rise in support fees (unless you negotiate a change). Knowing this in advance helps in planning and negotiating caps.
• Benchmark against peers or industry standards. If possible, find out what other companies of your size are paying for Unified Support (as a percentage of spend). While such information can be hard to get, industry analysts or licensing advisors often have ranges. If you discover, for instance, that peers pay around 7% of spend and you’re quoted 10%, you have a case to push back.
• Identify any add-ons or special services in your support package. Break down your current support contract: Does it include a Designated Support Engineer, extra training, or other premium services? Evaluate if those are truly needed or if they were “thrown in” and can be removed. Each add-on you drop could reduce cost.
• Assess internal support capabilities and alternatives. Consider how much you rely on Microsoft versus internal resources or third parties. If you have a strong internal IT team that handles most issues, your Microsoft support usage might remain low. In such cases, you might analyze if a smaller support plan or even third-party support could handle routine issues, keeping Microsoft’s Unified Support for only critical needs (or even not at all). This is strategic, but worth evaluating as a cost driver: you might be able to shrink the scope of Unified Support if you bolster other support channels.

By completing this checklist, you’ll have a clearer picture of why your Unified Support costs what it does, and where there’s room to optimize. It sets the stage for informed decision-making and stronger negotiation with Microsoft.

Preparing for Unified Support Renewal Negotiations

Negotiating a Unified Support contract with Microsoft can be challenging – Microsoft’s default stance is often “this is the formula.” But savvy customers know that everything is negotiable if you have data and leverage.

Here’s how to get ready for a renewal negotiation that puts you in the driver’s seat:

• Start Early (9–12 months out): Don’t wait until your support contract is about to expire. Begin internal discussions up to a year in advance. Microsoft typically sends renewal quotes a few months before expiry, but you should be formulating your strategy long before that. Early preparation gives you time to gather data (as per the checklist above) and identify what you want to change. It also sends Microsoft a signal that you’re not going to just roll over – you intend to scrutinize the deal.
• Collect Usage and Performance Data: Arm yourself with facts. How many tickets did you open? What severities were they? Did Microsoft meet its SLA targets (e.g., initial response times)? Did you utilize the proactive services included? Having this information allows you to say, “We paid $X last year for Y incidents – that’s $Z per incident, which is not a good ROI,” or “We never used the on-site visits we paid for.” This evidence is powerful when asking for a better price or a different package.
• Define Your Ideal Support Package: Before you meet with Microsoft, decide internally what you actually need and what you’re willing to pay. Determine the tier that makes sense given your analysis. Set a target budget or at least a “not to exceed” number. Also, decide on any changes in scope – for example, maybe you want to exclude a subsidiary or a certain product (maybe you’ll buy Azure support separately as it’s cheaper). Having a clear ask (e.g., “We need the Advanced tier, covering only divisions A and B, and we want to pay no more than $X”) guides the negotiation. Of course, you might not get exactly that, but it anchors the discussion.
• Leverage Big Picture Negotiations: The Unified Support renewal shouldn’t be viewed in isolation. It can be bundled into your broader Microsoft negotiations. If you have an Enterprise Agreement (EA) renewal, a large Azure project, or a big Microsoft purchase on the horizon, bring Unified Support into the conversation. Microsoft account teams want to sell you more products and cloud services – use that as leverage to get concessions on support. For instance, “We’re considering an Azure expansion, but these support fees are an obstacle. What can you do to make the support costs more palatable if we commit to Azure growth?” Tying support to other deals can open the door to discounts or special terms.
• Consider Alternative Support Options: While negotiating with Microsoft, it doesn’t hurt to evaluate third-party support providers (or Microsoft’s own alternative support plans like pay-per-incident for Azure or Premier Support for some segments if still available). If Microsoft knows you have a credible plan to switch to another support model or provider, they may become more flexible on price. Even if you don’t actually plan to leave, having an alternative quote or strategy is a strong negotiation tactic. (Be sure to involve your legal/procurement teams when discussing alternatives, to ensure continuity of support in worst-case scenarios.)
• Aim for Contractual Safeguards: As part of negotiations, try to secure terms that protect you going forward. For example, negotiate a cap on year-over-year price increases (e.g., support fee cannot increase more than 5% annually, regardless of spend growth). If you expect to trim your Microsoft usage, ensure there’s a provision to adjust the fee downward at renewal if spend drops. Push for clarity on how the fee is calculated so that you can verify it. If you’re doing a multi-year deal, insist on price locks or predictable step-ups, not open-ended “percentage of whatever we spend.” Microsoft may not volunteer these clauses, but if you have leverage and ask clearly, you’d be surprised what can be added to the contract.
• Get Executive Buy-In and Speak with One Voice: Internally, make sure your C-suite (CIO, CFO) is aware of the support costs and backs the plan to negotiate firmly. Sometimes, Microsoft’s strategy is to engage an executive and highlight the risk of not having top-tier support (“What if something goes wrong and you didn’t have Performance support?”). If your executives are on the same page about balancing risk vs cost, you won’t be undermined during negotiations. Present the negotiation as a partnership effort to Microsoft: you want a fair deal where both sides succeed. But be prepared to hold your ground – including the option of saying “no” to an offer that doesn’t meet your requirements.

In summary, treat the Unified Support renewal like any major contract renewal – do your homework, use leverage, and don’t accept the first quote.

Microsoft sales teams expect negotiations in their large accounts; those who come prepared can often save 15-30% or obtain better terms compared to the initial offer.

FAQs About Unified Support Pricing

Q: Why do our support costs keep rising even if we don’t use support more?
A: With Unified Support, your costs are tied to your Microsoft product spend, not how many tickets you log. So if your company’s Microsoft footprint grows – say you add more Office 365 users or your Azure bill increases – your support fee goes up accordingly. Additionally, Microsoft often bakes in year-over-year price increases or removes any first-year discounts at renewal, which makes the cost go up even if your usage stays flat. In short, you pay more because you own more Microsoft stuff (and because the contract likely has inflationary increases), regardless of whether you actually call support frequently.

Q: Can Microsoft discount Unified Support fees?
A: Yes, absolutely – though they might not volunteer that upfront. The “sticker price” for Unified Support is based on their percentage formula, but many enterprises have negotiated discounts or concessions. Microsoft has some flexibility, especially for large customers or strategic deals. You might receive a transition discount if you’re moving from Premier to Unified, or a discount for a multi-year commitment, or simply a lower percentage if you can demonstrate the initial quote is out of line. It helps to provide benchmarks or business justifications. Remember, everything is negotiable – but you have to ask and give Microsoft a reason to budge (competitive pressure, budget constraints, etc.). They won’t usually cut the fee in half, but even a reduction from, say, 10% to 8% of spend could save a lot of money.

Q: Do we have to include all global subsidiaries in one Unified Support agreement?
A: Not necessarily. Microsoft’s preference is often to roll everything into one umbrella (it simplifies their sales and maximizes the spend base). However, if certain subsidiaries or regions hardly use Microsoft support or operate somewhat independently, you have options. Some organizations negotiate separate support agreements for different divisions or choose to cover only the main entities. For example, you might put your high-impact business units under Unified Support but exclude a small subsidiary that can get by with basic support or none at all. Keep in mind that if a part of your company isn’t covered under Unified, they won’t be able to open support cases with Microsoft (unless they purchase support separately). So you must weigh the cost savings against the risk/benefit of not having unified coverage for that piece. It’s worth discussing the scope with Microsoft – sometimes carving out certain segments can reduce the overall fee.

Q: How do we switch support tiers (e.g., from Advanced down to Core) mid-term or mid-contract?
A: Generally, you can’t downgrade your tier in the middle of a contract year. When you sign a Unified Support agreement, you’re locked into that level and cost for the term (usually 12 months, unless you negotiated something else). Microsoft is not inclined to let you pay them less mid-year. They might allow an upgrade (if you want to move to a higher tier and pay more), but downgrades typically have to wait until renewal time. That’s why it’s crucial to pick the right tier from the start. If you realize you overshot, plan to make the change at the next renewal. Communicate with your Microsoft rep a few months before renewal that you intend to consider a lower tier, and gather the data to support why (e.g., “We didn’t use any of the Performance-tier-only services, so we will be moving to Advanced unless the pricing is adjusted.”). In summary, tier changes occur at renewal, not mid-term (except for upward changes, which increase the cost).

Q: Is Unified Support mandatory? What if we decide we don’t want it at all?
A: Unified Support isn’t legally “mandatory,” but for large enterprises, Microsoft heavily expects it. You could technically choose not to have a Unified Support contract – but then you’d have very limited support options (e.g., relying on community support, pay-per-incident support for Azur,e which is not feasible for complex issues, or third-party support providers). Some organizations have indeed opted out or dropped Unified Support to cut costs, using a combination of internal expertise and alternative support arrangements. However, this is a risk: if a major issue arises and you’re not covered, it could impact your business. Microsoft might also try to bundle support into EAs as a default. The better approach if you feel Unified is not worth it is to negotiate the scope or price down, or explore third-party support, which can often be cheaper. It’s not all-or-nothing; it’s about getting the support your business needs at a palatable cost. But be cautious about going completely without a Microsoft support agreement – it’s a bold move that should be carefully evaluated.

Five Expert Recommendations (and Next Steps)

Rather than a traditional conclusion, let’s wrap up with five actionable recommendations from experts to help you master Unified Support and keep costs in check.

These are strategic steps you can take next:

1. Audit Your Ticket History: Pull a detailed report of all Microsoft support tickets your organization logged over the last 12-24 months. Categorize them by severity, product, and time of day. Use this to identify patterns: How critical were most issues? Could some have been handled with a lower support level or internally? This audit will reveal if you’re over-insuring (paying for more support than you use). Next step: Match your past incidents to the features of each Unified tier – this helps decide the right tier and shows where you might trim scope.
2. Model Future Cloud Growth Impact: Work with your cloud architects and finance team to project your Azure and Microsoft 365 growth. Build a simple model that says “if our Azure spend grows by X%, our Unified Support fee would grow by roughly Y%.” This modeling prepares you for what your support costs will look like in 1, 2, 3 years if you change nothing. Next step: Take this model into your budgeting and negotiations – for instance, “We anticipate a 30% Azure growth, which would blow our support cost up by $300K. We need to negotiate a structure that doesn’t penalize this growth so heavily, or find a different support approach for Azure.”
3. Challenge and Remove Unused Services: Do a line-by-line review of what’s included in your Unified Support package. If you have a TAM assigned but rarely meet with them, note that. If you have proactive credits or workshops you’ve never scheduled, flag those. Then approach Microsoft (or your own procurement team) with a challenge: “We’re paying for X, Y, Z that we don’t use – how can we remove these or not pay for them?” Next step: Request a re-scoped support proposal with those elements removed or substituted. Even if Microsoft says they’re “free inclusions,” remember that nothing is truly free – they influence the pricing. Pushing to remove unused components can sometimes lead to a lower quote.
4. Negotiate Price Caps and Longer-Term Visibility: When you’re at the table with Microsoft, make controlling future costs a priority. For example, ask for a multi-year deal with capped increases. Or a clause that if your Microsoft spend doubles, the support percentage will be adjusted downward so you’re not paying double the fee. Also consider negotiating a “step-down”: if you plan to optimize or reduce certain usage, can you pay less if that happens? Microsoft may not agree to everything, but if you don’t ask, you definitely won’t get it. Next step: Draft a list of 2-3 key commercial protections (cap, fixed rate, etc.) you want, and present them during negotiations. Emphasize that without these, it’s hard for you to commit, given budget uncertainty.
5. Align Support Deal with Your EA Renewal or Big Purchases: As a final recommendation, treat Unified Support as part of the bigger partnership with Microsoft. Don’t handle it in a silo. Coordinate the timing – if your Enterprise Agreement renewal is coming up in 18 months, and support is up in 6 months, let Microsoft know you’re looking at the overall spend. Sometimes, you can even co-term support with an EA. Use any major project (a Dynamics rollout, a move to Windows 11, etc.) as negotiation leverage: Microsoft, we’re investing in your ecosystem, we need you to reciprocate with a reasonable support deal. Next step: Engage your Microsoft account team at a higher level, not just the support sales specialist. Bring in your Microsoft enterprise rep or even executives if the spend is big. Make support part of the strategic discussion about your account’s future. This often opens doors to better discounts or, at the very least, creative solutions (such as Microsoft finding budget to offset support costs if you commit to new products).

By following these expert tips, you’ll be well on your way to taming the beast of Unified Support costs. The key theme across all of them is proactive control – don’t let Microsoft’s default model dictate your fate.

Understand your needs, anticipate changes, and negotiate from a position of knowledge and strategy. That’s how you turn Unified Support from a dreaded expense into a manageable, predictable part of your IT investment. Good luck!

Read about our Microsoft Negotiation Services

Do you want to know more about our Microsoft Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit