Competitive Tension: Using RFPs & Multi-Cloud as Leverage
Introduction – Why Competitive Tension Works
Competitive tension in a Microsoft negotiation means making the vendor believe you have real alternatives. If Microsoft thinks you might move to a competitor, it will work much harder to keep your business.
Even if you plan to stay with Microsoft, the credible threat of switching to Amazon Web Services (AWS) or Google Cloud can dramatically improve the deal you get.
For CIOs and procurement leaders, the goal is to maximize competitive leverage against Microsoft – the next sections explain how RFPs and multi-cloud tactics can achieve that.
Read our complete guide to building Leverage in Microsoft Negotiations: Frameworks and Buyer Strategies.
The Role of RFPs in Microsoft Negotiations
One way to create this pressure is by issuing an RFP (Request for Proposal) to invite bids from multiple providers.
A formal RFP forces Microsoft to compete for your spend instead of assuming a renewal. By including Microsoft and other cloud vendors (like AWS and Google) in the process, you signal that your business is up for grabs.
To make an RFP effective, be specific and serious. Outline clear requirements and evaluate all vendors on the same criteria.
A well-run RFP (especially for a big renewal) can prompt Microsoft to preemptively sweeten its offer — for example, with deeper discounts or bundled extras — to win your vote. On the other hand, avoid issuing an RFP that’s half-hearted.
A vague or biased RFP will backfire, as vendors can tell if it’s not a genuine competition. The key is credibility: if Microsoft sees a detailed, real competition with major competitors involved, it will feel pressure to deliver a much better deal.
Leveraging Multi-Cloud as a Strategy
Another approach is leveraging a multi-cloud negotiation strategy – using AWS and GCP quotes as leverage against Azure.
This doesn’t require a formal RFP; it means gathering pricing from Microsoft’s rivals and benchmarking Microsoft’s offer against them.
For example, if AWS offers equivalent services for 20% less, you can take that to Microsoft and ask them to match or beat it. Multi-cloud positioning shows Microsoft that you have ready alternatives.
Enterprises use competitive cloud pricing to drive Microsoft discounts all the time. It effectively creates an AWS vs. Azure bidding war (with Google in the mix) that keeps prices competitive.
Knowing what AWS or Google would charge for your workloads gives you a strong negotiating stick. Microsoft tends to react quickly when it learns your cloud spend could shift elsewhere.
You might suddenly see better discounts or extra credits thrown into the deal, and higher-level Microsoft executives could get involved to keep you on board.
For example, an initial 10% Azure discount might jump to 15–20% once a credible AWS bid is in play.
Microsoft simply does not want to lose cloud workloads to its biggest competitors, so a believable multi-cloud strategy makes them work much harder to satisfy you.
RFP vs. Multi-Cloud – Which to Use? The table below compares a formal RFP with a multi-cloud leverage approach:
| Strategy | How It Works | Best Use Case | Buyer Risk | Microsoft’s Likely Response |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFP | Formal bidding process with multiple vendors (Microsoft + others) | Major renewals or new large projects | Time-intensive to run; requires clear scope | Will increase discounts, may offer custom bundles or special concessions |
| Multi-Cloud | Using AWS/GCP quotes and performance as a benchmark during negotiation | Azure-heavy organizations (to keep Azure prices honest) | Must be credible; bluffing is risky | Matches competitor pricing or adds Azure credits; higher discounts; exec outreach if needed |
Bundling Competition with Negotiation Timing
Timing is as important as strategy. Microsoft’s sales incentives peak at quarter-end and fiscal year-end, so aligning your competitive push with those moments amplifies your leverage.
For example, if you time your final decision for late June (Microsoft’s fiscal year-end), the Microsoft team will be highly motivated not to lose the deal. They may expedite approvals for larger discounts or add incentives to secure the contract in Q4.
Use Microsoft’s sales calendar to your advantage. Let them know you aim to decide by a certain date, which implicitly puts their deal deadline on that schedule.
When the clock is ticking – and especially if a rival offer is on the table – Microsoft’s team will scramble to hit their numbers by improving your terms.
In short, well-timed competitive tension (like an RFP or AWS quote surfacing right before Microsoft’s quarter closes) can lead to a significantly better final offer.
Do your homework, Should-Cost Modeling: Calculate What You Should Pay.
Building a Credible Competitive Story
Competitive talk is cheap unless you back it up with action. To make Microsoft believe your alternate plans, you need a credible story. Start with executive support: if your CIO or CFO is visibly exploring AWS or Google options, Microsoft will take it seriously.
Have tangible evidence of evaluation too – maybe a pilot workload on AWS, or a detailed cost comparison.
At the right moment, reference these facts: for instance, “AWS offered us X% lower cost for this scenario,” or “We already tested this system on Google Cloud.” Sharing specific competitor figures (tactfully) makes your position real.
The important thing is that every signal you send is backed by substance. If you threaten to move a workload, be ready to actually do it (at least in part). If you cite a competitor’s lower price, make sure it’s a legitimate quote.
Microsoft will sniff out empty bluffs quickly. A credible competitive story can be the difference between a token concession and a breakthrough discount – it tells Microsoft they can’t take your loyalty for granted.
Pitfalls to Avoid
Even a solid strategy can misfire if you make these mistakes:
- The token RFP: Don’t issue an RFP just for show. A poorly executed RFP (vague scope, unrealistic timeline) won’t fool Microsoft and can hurt your credibility.
- Mixed messages internally: Ensure your stakeholders are aligned. If Microsoft hears one executive say “we won’t really switch” while others talk about AWS, your leverage evaporates.
- Ignoring switching costs: Be ready when Microsoft points out the costs and risks of moving to another cloud. If you haven’t considered migration effort, training, or other expenses, you could be caught off guard. Know the numbers so their “stay with us” arguments don’t derail your strategy.
Negotiation Playbook – Practical Steps
- Assess your dependency: Identify which workloads or services are tightly tied to Microsoft and which are portable. This shows where you have the flexibility to switch if needed.
- Develop a competitive plan (or RFP): Outline your needs and invite multiple bids (formally or informally). Seeing proposals from Microsoft, AWS, and Google side by side gives you options and data to negotiate.
- Gather pricing benchmarks: Get quotes or estimates from AWS/GCP and learn what discounts others get. Know how Microsoft’s offer compares. These will be your talking points in negotiations.
- Align leadership: Ensure your CIO, CFO, and other key leaders support using competition as a lever. Internal buy-in means Microsoft hears a consistent message that you’re prepared to go elsewhere.
- Leverage timing: Plan your negotiation milestones around Microsoft’s quarter-ends or year-end. Aim to have final discussions when Microsoft’s urgency to close is highest.
Learn the strategies of using esclations, Escalation Tactics: Involving Execs to Strengthen Your Position.
FAQs
Do we need to be ready to leave Microsoft for this to work?
Not completely, but you should have a viable backup plan. You don’t have to actually switch vendors in the end, but Microsoft must believe you could. Identify some workloads or services you would move to AWS/GCP if needed so that your threat carries weight.
How can smaller enterprises create credible competition?
Even smaller companies can do this by getting multiple quotes. For example, get pricing from a Microsoft reseller and also from AWS or Google for the same requirements. Showing that you’ve compared options (even on a smaller scale) makes Microsoft work harder for your business.
Should competitor quotes be shared directly with Microsoft?
Usually not in full detail. It’s enough to tell Microsoft, “we have a better offer from another provider,” and maybe share key numbers or percentages. You rarely need to hand over the actual proposal. If Microsoft presses for proof, you can share a redacted snippet or summary, but often a confident reference to the competing quote is sufficient.
Is multi-cloud valuable even if 80% of our workloads are with Microsoft?
Yes. Even if most of your IT is on Microsoft, keeping some workload on another platform (or simply proving you could shift a portion) keeps Microsoft on its toes. It prevents complacency. Microsoft knows that to retain that 80%, they need to stay competitive, because you’ve shown that the other 20% (or future projects) could go elsewhere. A multi-cloud strategy is like insurance and gives you leverage for negotiation.
Read about our Microsoft Negotiation Services
