Benchmarking Microsoft EA Discounts: Are You Getting a Good Deal?

Introduction – Why Benchmarking Matters

In Microsoft Enterprise Agreement (EA) negotiations, benchmarking involves comparing your offered pricing and discounts with those of similar organizations.

This matters because Microsoft’s first quote rarely reflects the true market value. In fact, the initial EA renewal quote often comes in high, assuming many customers won’t push back. By benchmarking, you can identify if you’re leaving money on the table.

Microsoft once offered transparent volume discounts (tiered pricing levels A–D) that automatically lowered prices as the number of users increased. Those built-in discounts have faded or been eliminated in recent years, especially by 2025.

That means your renewal quote might not include any inherent volume savings – you have to negotiate them. Read our Microsoft EA Renewal Negotiation Strategies for 2025.

If you don’t benchmark your deal against market norms, you could end up paying significantly more than your peers for the same licenses. In short, knowing the typical discount ranges others secure is essential to judging if your deal is truly competitive.

Typical Discount Ranges (2025)

So what discounts are enterprises actually getting on Microsoft EAs in 2025? While every deal is unique, there are some general ranges that many large organizations achieve when they negotiate effectively.

Keep in mind these ranges vary by company size, industry, and how much competitive pressure you apply:

• Large Enterprise Seat Discounts: If you have over 5,000 users (a sizable enterprise), it’s common to negotiate around 15–25% off the list price on Microsoft 365 E3 licenses. Companies with 10,000 or 20,000+ seats tend to push toward the higher end of that range. Truly huge organizations (50,000 seats and up) sometimes secure around 30% off or more on E3, especially with a strong negotiation. Smaller enterprises (below 5,000 seats) will see lower discounts, often under 15%, simply due to less volume leverage.
• E5 Adoption Incentives: If you’re upgrading from E3 to Microsoft 365 E5 (Microsoft’s top-tier bundle with security, compliance, and voice features), Microsoft often provides 20–30% off the E5 portion to encourage the move. E5 plans are significantly more expensive than E3, so Microsoft has room to discount them if it means higher adoption of those advanced features. For example, a peer company of ~5,000 users might have gotten nearly 20% off E5 licenses after pushing back on the initial quote. Microsoft is keen to upsell E5 (for its security and AI features), so they may be unusually flexible on E5 pricing in competitive situations.
• Azure Spending Commitments: Bringing a large Azure cloud spend into your EA can unlock steeper savings. It’s not unusual to see 20–35% off Azure consumption commitments in an EA when you actively negotiate and have AWS or Google Cloud in the wings. Microsoft will often match or beat cloud pricing if it knows you’re considering moving workloads to a competitor. Larger Azure commitments (with millions of dollars in annual cloud spend) get toward that 30+% discount range, whereas a smaller Azure commitment might only get you 10–20% off without competitive pressure.
• Other Products (Power Platform, Dynamics 365, etc.): Add-on products, such as Power Platform (Power BI, Power Apps) or Dynamics 365 CRM/ERP modules, typically receive more modest discounts, typically 10–20% off. These products might not have as much margin for deep cuts, but they are often negotiable, especially if you bundle them into a larger EA renewal. Microsoft may give a bit on these to secure a broader deal. Also, if you’re considering new offerings like the Microsoft Copilot AI services, be aware that Microsoft might offer promotional discounts or free trial periods rather than straight price cuts, given the buzz around these new products.

Negotiation is a team game; read Building Your Microsoft EA Negotiation Team and Internal Playbook.

To summarize these typical ranges, here’s an example benchmarking table for large enterprise deals in 2025:

Note: These ranges reflect typical outcomes for sizable enterprises in North America and Europe (EMEA) markets. In practice, the exact percentages vary.

For instance, one industry may see higher M365 discounts due to a strong Google presence (e.g., tech or media companies).

In contrast, another industry might get a special deal on Dynamics if that’s strategic for Microsoft.

Also, Microsoft’s pricing tactics can differ by region – a great discount achieved in the US won’t automatically appear in EMEA quotes unless you negotiate globally.

Always ensure your multinational deal is benchmarked across regions so one country isn’t paying more than another for the same licenses.

For strategy and tactics, read Microsoft EA Negotiation Best Practices – A CIO’s Guide (2025 Renewal Edition).

Factors That Influence Discounts

Why do some companies get better EA discounts than others? Several key factors drive how far Microsoft is willing to bend on pricing:

• Deal Size (Seat Count & Spend): The larger your organization (and the more licenses or cloud services you’re buying), the more leverage you have. A company with 20,000 or 50,000 users has significant clout – Microsoft stands to lose a huge contract if you walk away, so they’ll consider deeper concessions. By contrast, a 1,000-seat firm will have more limited wiggle room. Essentially, volume is power. Large deal = big bargaining chip.
• Timing and Microsoft’s Fiscal Year: When you negotiate, it can impact the discount. Microsoft’s fiscal year ends on June 30th, and their sales teams face quarterly and year-end quotas. As a result, they become much more flexible at quarter-end (especially Q4, April–June). If your EA renewal lines up with Microsoft’s year-end or quarter-end, use that. Last-minute deals in late June (or even late September/December for quarterly pushes) often yield an extra few percentage points because reps are desperate to hit targets. Negotiation tip: Don’t rush to sign early; let Microsoft know that stretching the deal to their quarter-end could be an option – it implicitly tells them “you need this deal closed now, so sharpen your pencil.”
• Competitive Pressure (Alternatives): Nothing motivates Microsoft more than the threat of competition. If you make it clear you’re considering AWS or Google Cloud for your cloud workloads, or evaluating Google Workspace instead of Microsoft 365, Microsoft will likely respond with better pricing. Even without a formal RFP, casually mentioning “we have a competing quote” or “we’re exploring other vendors” puts Microsoft on notice. They will often seek special approval to drop prices further rather than risk losing a big customer to a rival. Pro tip: Ensure your threat is credible – for example, having a pilot with Google or a known presence of AWS in your environment makes your threat real in Microsoft’s eyes.
• Strategic Products and New Initiatives: Microsoft may offer larger discounts on products it is strategically promoting. In 2025, this includes features such as security & compliance add-ons, Power Platform, and new AI offerings like Microsoft Copilot. If adopting these is part of your plan, Microsoft might offer aggressive incentives (like an extra discount on those licenses or even on your core EA) to land a high-profile win. Additionally, bundling more products into your EA (say, adding Dynamics 365 or committing to a larger Azure spend) can be used as a bargaining chip: “We’ll consider bringing this new business to Microsoft, but we need a better overall discount in return.” Microsoft loves to broaden the scope of EAs, and they often reward you for it – just be careful only to buy what you’ll actually use.
• Relationship and Customer Profile: How Microsoft views your account matters. Long-term customers who consistently grow their Microsoft footprint can sometimes negotiate “loyalty” benefits. Still, paradoxically, new big-logo customers might get a fantastic first-deal discount to win them over. Suppose your company is a marquee name or leader in a certain industry. In that case, Microsoft might treat you as a reference account – meaning they’ll bend the rules (with special pricing or extras) to keep you happy, knowing they can brag about the partnership. On the flip side, if you’ve shown willingness to sign whatever is offered in the past, your Microsoft reps might aim higher on the renewal, expecting less pushback. It pays to change that perception by coming to the table with data. Finally, if you operate across regions (e.g. North America and EMEA), leverage your global scale: insist on a unified discount rate so that, say, your European subsidiaries aren’t offered a weaker deal than your U.S. HQ. Microsoft’s field teams may start with regional differences, but you can negotiate as a single global customer for the best outcome.
• Industry Context: Your industry can subtly influence discounts. In sectors where Microsoft faces stiff competition or sees big growth potential (like tech, retail, and professional services), it may be more generous to prevent losing ground. For example, a tech firm considering open-source or Google alternatives might get a very aggressive offer. In highly regulated industries (banking, healthcare, government), Microsoft knows switching is harder due to compliance needs, so the competitive threat is lower – discounts might then lean more on volume and timing than fear of defection. Also, certain industries might benefit from specialized programs (government and education often have their own pricing schemes), which can cap or structure discounts differently. For a commercial enterprise, however, industry factors mainly come down to how badly Microsoft wants a win (or case study) in that field versus the risk of you choosing another route.

How to Benchmark Your EA Internally

Benchmarking isn’t a one-and-done number; it’s a process.

Here’s how you can gather and use data to see how your EA offer stacks up:

1. Compare with Reseller Quotes (CSP Options): Engage a Cloud Solution Provider (CSP) reseller or two and get pricing for an equivalent set of licenses. CSPs often have pricing flexibility and can quote Microsoft 365 or Azure subscriptions outside of an EA. If a reseller can offer similar products ata lower cost, that’s a red flag that your EA quote is too high. Even if you prefer an EA for its benefits, the CSP pricing gives a market checkpoint.
2. Leverage Third-Party Benchmark Data: Consider bringing in a software licensing advisor or using benchmarking services. Firms that specialize in Microsoft negotiations have anonymized data from many clients. They can tell you, for example, “Companies of your size (say 10,000 users in North America) are seeing around 22% off on E3 and 30% off on E5,” or whatever the case may be. This data is incredibly valuable. If hiring a consultant isn’t an option, at least scour industry reports, webinars, or whitepapers for any figures on EA discount averages in 2025. Some advisory firms publish free insights (e.g., average discounts by seat tier or region) that you can use as a reference.
3. Peer Networking: Tap into your network of peers in similar industries or of similar company size. While many won’t share exact pricing (NDAs abound), they might share general experiences like “we pushed Microsoft and got about 25% off our whole E5 deal” or “Azure was roughly 30% lower than list for us after negotiations.” User groups, industry conferences, or procurement forums can be good places to hear these anecdotes. Even hearing “Microsoft gave us a lot when we mentioned AWS” can reinforce your strategy.
4. Review Your Own History: Don’t overlook internal benchmarks. What discount did you get in your last EA? If three years ago you had, say, an 18% on Office 365, and now Microsoft’s initial renewal quote shows only 5%, that discrepancy needs to be questioned. Additionally, if you have multiple agreements (perhaps in different regions or divisions), compare them to ensure consistency. Ensure that one part of your organization isn’t paying significantly more per license than another. Internal consistency matters – Microsoft sometimes relies on siloed negotiations to justify uneven pricing.
5. Apples-to-Apples Comparisons: As you gather data, be very careful to match like-for-like. An average “20% discount” is meaningless unless it’s on the same type of licensing mix. Benchmark per-product if possible. For example, maybe you hear a peer got 25% off their Office 365 E3, but their deal didn’t include Azure. If your quote includes Azure with only 5% off, that’s an area to target. Or vice versa – maybe Azure is where others see 15% off, and you have 0%. Also consider contract terms: a 3-year EA versus a shorter term, or standard support versus premium support – these factors can significantly impact pricing. In short, align the scope when comparing. It’s about finding relevant benchmarks (same region, similar size, similar product bundle) to truly judge your deal.
6. Document Your Findings: Compile a brief of your benchmark findings to use in negotiations. Perhaps make a small table or list: e.g., “Our quote: 10% off M365 E5; Benchmark for ~5k users: ~18% off.” Having these concrete numbers at hand will make your discussions with Microsoft far more fact-based (and you’ll feel more confident knowing your ask is reasonable, not just wishful thinking).

Using Benchmark Data in Negotiation

Now you’ve got the data – how do you use it to get a better deal?

The key is to integrate your benchmarks into your negotiation strategy in a professional, non-confrontational way:

• Lead with Facts, Not Emotion: Start pricing discussions by calmly laying out what you know about the market. For example: “Organizations of our size are typically seeing about 15–20% off on Microsoft 365 E3. Our current renewal quote is only showing 5% off – that’s well below market.” This immediately signals to Microsoft that you’ve done your homework. You might follow with a specific example (without naming the other company): “We’re aware of a recent deal where a 5,000-seat company secured roughly an 18% discount on E5 licenses. Our discount is only 10%. We need to close that gap.” By citing a credible benchmark, you turn what could be dismissed as “we want a lower price” into “the market rate compels a lower price.”
• Be Firm on Big Discrepancies: You don’t have to haggle over every line item if your overall discount is decent. Focus on where you’re clearly off-market. Let’s say your biggest spend area is Azure, but Microsoft isn’t giving any discount on your Azure consumption. You can point out: “Azure is a major part of our IT spend. We have evidence that similar enterprises receive at least a 15% discount on Azure in their agreements. If we can’t achieve something comparable, we’ll have to seriously consider shifting workloads.” This ties the benchmark to a business decision—a powerful combination.
• Position It as Seeking Fairness, Not Threatening: The tone matters. You’re not telling Microsoft how to run their business; you’re asking for parity so your business isn’t at a disadvantage. Phrases like “We need to be at market level” or “We’re looking for a fair deal in line with what other customers our size receive” frame it collaboratively. You can even say, “We value our partnership with Microsoft, but we have a responsibility to ensure we’re getting a competitive price. These benchmarks are guiding our targets.” This way, Microsoft understands you mean business, but you’re not just squeezing them arbitrarily.
• Show Willingness to Explore Alternatives: If Microsoft resists, gently remind them that you do have options. For example: “If we can’t get to at least 20% off on these licenses, we will need to evaluate other solutions – whether that’s shifting some users to a different platform or delaying certain expansions.” This isn’t an outright ultimatum; it’s a statement of practical necessity. You’re signaling that an uncompetitive deal simply won’t be approved internally, and you might have to fragment the deal or shop around. Often, that prospect is enough to push Microsoft back to the table with an improved offer.
• Leverage Timing and Deadlines in Tandem with Benchmarks: As negotiations heat up, remember Microsoft’s internal clock. If you’re a few weeks from quarter-end and still apart on price, use that as leverage. You might say, “We want to wrap this up, but at these numbers, we can’t justify signing. We’re prepared to extend discussions into next quarter if needed, but I suspect neither of us wants that. Let’s find a way to meet these benchmark targets now.” This underscores that you won’t be bullied by time, and you know they have an incentive to close soon.

Using benchmark data in this way strengthens your credibility. Microsoft’s reps often claim that a certain discount is a “one-time exception” or that you’re already getting a great deal.

When you bring external data, it’s harder for them to use those lines. You’re effectively saying, “We know what’s out there; give us a deal that’s truly competitive.” The negotiation becomes based on facts, not just sales tactics.

Caution: Benchmarking Pitfalls

Benchmarking is powerful, but it must be used wisely. Here are a few cautions to keep in mind:

• Don’t Misapply Generic Ranges: A big mistake would be to grab a random percentage you heard at a conference and demand it without context. Remember that every deal has unique variables. Perhaps you’ve heard “Company X got 30% off their EA,” but if Company X has 50,000 users and you have 5,000, your expectations need to be scaled accordingly. Use ranges as guidance, not guarantees. Aim for the high end of a realistic range for your profile, but don’t insist on an outlier if there’s no logical reason you’d get it.
• Ensure Like-for-Like Comparisons: We touched on this, but it’s worth repeating: verify that any benchmark data you use matches the products and terms you’re negotiating. If you quote a benchmark for “M365 E5 discount”, be sure it’s for a similar volume of E5 licenses and under a similar multi-year term. A common pitfall is comparing one company’s E5 deal to your E3 deal, or a 1-year subscription price to your 3-year locked EA price – those aren’t apples-to-apples. Microsoft will rightly point out differences if your comparison isn’t fair, which could undermine your argument.
• Beware of List Price Tricks: Microsoft’s pricing and discounts can sometimes be a shell game. Don’t get too obsessed with the percentage discount at the expense of the actual dollar cost. For instance, Microsoft could inflate a list price and then show you a “25% discount” that still ends up higher than another customer’s 15% discount deal (because maybe that other customer had a lower starting list price). Always calculate what your effective per-user or per-product cost is and compare those dollar figures as well. The goal is to pay less, not just to win a bigger-sounding discount.
• Unique Account Circumstances: Recognize if there are things about your situation that might justify a different outcome. For example, if you’re significantly downsizing your license count due to layoffs, you might not get as high a discount because your volume is shrinking (even if other companies your size got it while growing). Or if you require a special contract term that adds risk for Microsoft, they may hold back a bit on discounts. Understand the context around numbers, not just the numbers themselves.
• Keep Information Sensitivity in Mind: Finally, be careful how you use any confidential info. If a peer shared something with you in confidence, don’t reveal anything that could identify them. It’s fine to say “an advisor informed us of a comparable deal” but not “my friend at XYZ Corp said…”. Microsoft will take your benchmarking seriously as long as you present it professionally. Just don’t bluff with data you can’t back up or that sounds implausible – they’ll see through it.

By avoiding these pitfalls, you ensure that benchmarking truly works in your favor rather than leading you astray. It should be a tool to illuminate a fair deal, not a hammer to demand an unrealistic price.

Read about our Microsoft Negotiation Services.

Do you want to know more about our Microsoft Negotiation Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit