Microsoft EA Renewal Negotiation Strategies for 2025

Microsoft EA Renewal Negotiation Strategies for 2025

Renewing a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement (EA) is a major event for any enterprise.

An EA renewal means committing to another multi-year contract for Microsoft software and cloud services.

It’s an opportunity to revisit what you’re paying for, adjust your license quantities, and negotiate terms that better fit your organization.

In 2025, however, EA renewals come with new twists that make this cycle very different from past years.

Microsoft is shaking up its licensing and pricing models in 2025. For one, the company is heavily promoting new AI-powered products, such as Microsoft 365 Copilot.

These promise cutting-edge productivity gains, but they also come with hefty price tags and unproven value, so they shouldn’t just be blindly added to your agreement.

At the same time, traditional volume discounts will end by late 2025 – Microsoft will no longer offer automatic price breaks for large seat counts on cloud services after November 1, 2025.

This means that if you renew after that date, you may face paying standard list prices, regardless of your size, a significant change that could increase costs for large enterprises.

Additionally, Microsoft continues its “cloud-first” push, encouraging (or pressuring) customers to commit to Azure and cloud subscriptions, and even steering smaller clients off the EA program entirely in favor of Cloud Solution Provider (CSP) agreements.

All these factors make 2025 a uniquely challenging year for EA negotiations.

The tactics that were effective a few years ago need to be updated to address new pricing realities and evolving product offerings.

Enterprises need a refreshed playbook for this renewal cycle – one that anticipates Microsoft’s moves and protects your organization’s interests.

The following sections outline a comprehensive strategy for negotiating your EA renewal in 2025, from preparation steps to specific tactics and considerations about this year’s trends.

1. Assessing Your Starting Point

Before you even think about talking numbers with Microsoft, take a hard look at your current EA. A successful negotiation starts with knowing exactly what you have, what you use, and what you’re spending.

This means conducting an internal licensing audit as groundwork.

First, evaluate your current usage and identify any “shelfware” – licenses and subscriptions you’re paying for but not actually using. It’s common over a multi-year EA to accumulate excess licenses or added products that sounded useful but ended up underutilized.

Look for underused software (e.g., a security add-on enabled for all users when only a small team needed it) and redundant tools (perhaps you have two products with overlapping functionality).

Pay special attention to high-cost items like Microsoft 365 E5 or add-on services: are all the advanced features being actively used, or could some users be on a lower tier like E3 without losing productivity?

Next, assess whether any workloads are over-provisioned.

In cloud services (Azure or Microsoft 365), over-provisioning can mean you’re allocating more resources or higher license levels than necessary.

For instance, you might be paying for Azure compute capacity that sits idle, or you might have deployed Power BI Pro licenses widely when only a portion of staff creates reports. Identifying these will show where to trim fat.

To organize your audit, here’s a quick checklist of what to review internally:

• License counts vs. active usage: For each major product (Office 365, Windows, Dynamics, etc.), compare how many licenses you purchased to how many are actually assigned and in use. This will spotlight surplus licenses you can potentially remove at renewal.
• Feature utilization: Within bundled suites like Microsoft 365, analyze which features or services people actually use. If you’re on a premium plan (like E5) but not leveraging its advanced features (advanced security, telephony, analytics, etc.), that’s a clue you might downgrade some users.
• Unused add-ons or services: List any extra services (e.g., Visio, Project, Audio Conferencing, additional security modules) that were included “just in case.” Determine if they have real adoption or if they’ve been forgotten.
• On-premises software and Software Assurance: Check any on-prem licenses under the EA – are you still using those servers, or have you transitioned to cloud equivalents? If some on-premises software is now legacy, you might consider dropping it or reducing quantities.
• Redundant solutions: Identify if you’re paying Microsoft for something you also get via another vendor. For example, if you bought a Microsoft security bundle but also have a third-party security tool doing the same job, you might eliminate one.

By thoroughly assessing your starting point, you achieve two things. First, you clean up your baseline – ensuring that you only negotiate for what you actually need going forward.

Second, you equip yourself with data to justify cuts or changes to Microsoft.

It’s easier to say “we don’t need X licenses next term” when you have usage reports and facts in hand. This audit prevents you from blindly renewing the same bundle and quantity as before, and it lays the foundation for cost savings in your renewal.

2. Setting Clear Objectives

Walking into an EA renewal without clear objectives is like walking into a vendor’s store with a blank check.

Before engaging with Microsoft, CIOs and their teams should define exactly what they want out of the renewal. Setting clear objectives will guide your negotiation strategy and keep your team aligned.

Start by pinning down your top priorities. Common objectives for an EA renewal include reducing costs, optimizing the product mix, and increasing flexibility in the agreement. But you should get specific.

For example, is your goal to trim 10% off your annual Microsoft spend? Are you aiming to introduce certain new technologies (maybe Power Platform tools or Azure services) while cutting back on others?

Is flexibility to reduce licenses over time a key concern due to a possible divestiture or fluctuating staffing? Write these down and get a consensus among your stakeholders.

Make sure these goals tie into your broader business and digital strategy.

The EA should support where your organization is headed in the next 3-5 years. If your enterprise has a cloud migration plan, an AI adoption strategy, or perhaps a mandate to tighten budgets, those all should influence your EA renewal goals.

Aligning the EA with your digital roadmap ensures you’re negotiating for an agreement that enables your plans, not just reflects past usage.

It’s often useful to formulate a checklist of strategic questions that your team answers upfront:

• “Where can we cut without business risk?” – Identify areas from your audit where reducing licenses or removing a service will have minimal impact on users or can be mitigated by alternatives. This highlights safe cost-cutting targets.
• “Do we need Microsoft’s new offerings (like Copilot) now, or later?” – Decide if adopting new AI or other products in 2025 is mission-critical or if it can wait. Perhaps you could plan a pilot first (now) and adopt it fully only if it proves its value (later). This prevents being upsold on day one without clarity.
• “What level of flexibility do we require?” – Consider how your user count and needs might change. If your company is eyeing an acquisition or could face a reorganization, you might need clauses for adding new subsidiaries or adjusting license counts mid-term. If you’re uncertain about future software needs, you might prioritize shorter agreement terms or an option to swap certain licenses later.
• “What are our must-have products versus nice-to-haves?” – Rank the components of your Microsoft stack. Perhaps Exchange Online and Windows are non-negotiable must-haves, but that experimental analytics tool could be dropped if it doesn’t fit the budget. Knowing this helps in making trade-off decisions during negotiation.
• “How does this renewal support our business goals?” – For example, if your company aims to improve cybersecurity, maybe one objective is to obtain Microsoft’s advanced security features, but at a palatable price. If innovation is a goal, you might want flexibility to try Azure services without large commitments. Tie the EA renewal to these higher goals.

By answering these questions, the CIO and team create a renewal plan with direction. These objectives will serve as guardrails when talks with Microsoft begin.

For instance, if cost reduction is a primary objective, that stance informs how hard you’ll push back on price increases or unneeded additions.

If flexibility is key, you’ll focus negotiation on terms allowing license count adjustments or shorter commitments. Clear objectives also help you measure success: after the deal, you can check if you met your cost target or secured the needed terms.

Finally, communicate these objectives to your negotiation team (in the next section) and executive sponsors.

Ensure everyone, from the IT architects to the CFO, understands the game plan and what the organization is trying to achieve. This unity will be crucial once negotiations with Microsoft begin.

3. Building Your Negotiation Team & Plan

An EA renewal is not a solo endeavor. It touches technical, financial, legal, and strategic aspects of your business.

That’s why assembling a cross-functional negotiation team is critical. Each member plays a role in securing the best deal, and together they present a united front to Microsoft.

Who should be at the table?

At minimum, include representatives from IT, Procurement (or Vendor Management), Finance, and Legal – and have a clear executive sponsor. Here’s why each is important:

• IT Leadership and Asset Managers: They understand your current usage deeply and know your future technical needs. IT can identify what can be cut or where you might need new services. They’ll provide the data (from your audit) to back up requests and will evaluate the technical viability of Microsoft’s proposals.
• Procurement or Sourcing Managers: These team members specialize in negotiating with vendors. They will lead the tactical negotiation, handle communications with Microsoft’s sales team, and bring expertise in contract bargaining. They ensure the process follows a strategy and that you’re not leaving value on the table.
• Finance Representatives: Finance will keep the numbers honest. They’ll model the cost implications of proposals, set budget limits, and validate whether a “deal” really meets your cost objectives. They’re also the voice of financial governance, ensuring the agreement makes economic sense over its life.
• Legal Counsel: Microsoft’s EA terms can be complex. Legal experts review the fine print to protect you from unfavorable clauses. They check the language around things like indemnity, data privacy, audit rights, and ensure any custom terms you negotiate are correctly documented. Legal’s role is to mitigate risks that could cost you later.
• Executive Sponsor (CIO, CFO, or other C-level): Having a C-level sponsor involved (even if not in every meeting) is a huge plus. It signals to Microsoft that this negotiation has top-level attention, which can elevate the seriousness on their side. The executive sponsor can make final decisions quickly and is often empowered to say “yes” or “no” to major trade-offs or to approve significant spend – or to walk away if necessary. Internally, they ensure the team has the authority and resources to negotiate firmly.

Once the team is in place, clearly define roles and responsibilities. For example, decide who is the chief negotiator who will be the primary voice to Microsoft – often someone from procurement or a project lead.

Determine who will manage internal coordination (scheduling prep meetings, consolidating feedback on proposals, etc.).

Assign someone to document everything (offers, decisions, follow-ups) so you maintain a paper trail. If you plan to involve a third-party advisor or consultant, decide how they fit into the team.

Next, align on a negotiation plan and timeline. Ideally, start the renewal process well in advance – many suggest beginning 6 to 12 months before the EA expiration.

Early preparation allows you to set your strategy without time pressure.

Map out key milestones: internal audit completion, objective setting (which you’ve done), initial approach to Microsoft for renewal, deadlines for Microsoft to provide proposals, times when you’ll escalate issues, and a target date to finalize the agreement.

Having a timeline ensures you’re not caught scrambling as the expiration looms, which is a position that favors Microsoft, not you.

Crucially, as a team, agree on your walk-away points and BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement).

In plain terms, know your limits and backup plan. For instance, decide the maximum total cost you’re willing to accept – beyond which you would explore drastic alternatives (like dropping certain Microsoft services or moving to another licensing program).

Or set a firm stance that if Microsoft won’t include a needed flexibility clause, you’re prepared to escalate to higher management or even consider a non-EA option (like splitting to CSP for some services).

When the team is unified on these non-negotiables, Microsoft’s attempts to divide and conquer (like a salesperson trying to appeal to just the IT lead by downplaying a finance concern) will be less effective.

Throughout the process, maintain open and frequent communication within your team and leadership. Provide regular updates to the executive sponsor or steering committee about how negotiations are progressing, especially if any big issues arise.

This internal alignment prevents surprises and ensures that everyone remains committed to the strategy, even when negotiations become tough.

In summary, treat the EA renewal like a project with a dedicated team and plan.

The strength of a cross-functional team is that you cover all angles – usage needs, cost, legal safety, negotiation tactics – and you avoid mistakes like agreeing to technical terms that finance can’t sustain, or vice versa.

With the right people at the table and a clear plan, you greatly improve your leverage and the quality of outcomes from the negotiation.

4. Research & Benchmarking

Walking into a negotiation armed with solid information can be the difference between a mediocre deal and a great one. Research and benchmarking are your tools to level the playing field with Microsoft’s sales team.

Remember, Microsoft’s reps negotiate deals like this every day; you do it once every three years. Level up by gathering data on current market pricing and terms.

Understand the market pricing: Microsoft’s pricing isn’t public in a simple way – it varies by customer, deal, and timing. Don’t accept at face value any claim like “This is the standard price all customers pay.”

Often, that “standard” is just the starting bid. To push back, find out what discounts and prices peer companies (of similar size and industry) are getting. For example, if you’re renewing Microsoft 365 E5 licenses, what is the per-user per-month rate that others have negotiated recently?

Perhaps you’re quoted a price of $60, but an industry benchmark might show that others of your size have it closer to $50. That insight gives you a target and evidence that a lower price is achievable.

How to benchmark? There are a few practical ways:

• Peer networking: Quietly talk to trusted contacts in other companies (maybe through industry groups or professional networks). Many enterprises are willing to share general figures or percentage discounts as long as it’s not attributable. For instance, you might learn “Company X with 10k users got 20% off the list price on their EA last quarter.”
• Advisors and consultants: Licensing advisory firms and consultancies often keep anonymized databases of deals. If you work with such an advisor, they can provide benchmark ranges for discounts on various Microsoft products. They might say, “Organizations in your range typically see 15-25% off Office 365” or similar.
• Experience and data: Look at your own historical data – what discount level did you secure in your last EA? Has your buying profile grown to potentially merit a better deal now? Also, review any past proposals or competing quotes (e.g., maybe three years ago you considered a Microsoft Products & Services Agreement or CSP quote – how did those prices compare?).
• Public information and forums: Sometimes, community forums or published reports (from IT research firms) contain tidbits on Microsoft pricing changes and typical discounts. Microsoft itself might publish some “average pricing” info, but treat that skeptically, as it often blends various cases.

Benchmarking isn’t only about price; it also involves researching the contractual terms peers have achieved. For example, are other enterprises getting a 5% cap on year-over-year price increases? Did someone negotiate a special clause for flexibility or a longer price lock? Such intel can inspire your asks.

Armed with this data, you can counter Microsoft’s offers with confidence. If the initial renewal quote seems high compared to benchmarks, you can explicitly push back: “This pricing is above what we’re seeing in the market for companies of our size.

We need to see a better discount to be in line with current standards.” Microsoft representatives then know you’re an informed customer; they may not concede immediately, but it changes the tone of the conversation.

Competitive intelligence also plays a role. Understand the alternatives to staying with Microsoft’s current structure. For instance, know what it would cost and entail to move some portion of users to Google Workspace, or to use Amazon’s or Google’s cloud for certain workloads, or even to shift to a CSP arrangement.

You don’t necessarily want to switch, but having an idea of those costs gives you a credible position to negotiate.

You can subtly let Microsoft know you’ve evaluated other options. For example: “We’ve looked at doing this via a CSP partner or even how other vendors price similar solutions, and we see room for improvement in Microsoft’s offer.”

Finally, keep abreast of Microsoft’s own announcements and fiscal situation.

If Microsoft is introducing a price hike soon (which they sometimes announce in advance), you might use that timing to your advantage by closing a deal before the hike. If their cloud division had a slow quarter, perhaps they are keener to offer discounts to spur Azure deals.

These factors can influence your approach to when and how hard to negotiate.

In summary, do not enter negotiations in the dark. By thoroughly researching and benchmarking, you transform negotiation from a guessing game to a data-driven discussion.

It empowers you to challenge quotes that are out of line and to set stretch goals for what you want to achieve (maybe you aim for a certain percentage cost reduction because you know it’s been done).

This preparation significantly strengthens your negotiation stance and helps avoid overpaying or agreeing to subpar terms.

5. Key Negotiation Strategies

With preparation done, it’s time to execute strategies that will drive a better deal. In 2025’s landscape, simply renewing the status quo could mean higher costs and less value. Instead, approach the negotiation proactively with tactics that extract concessions and optimize the agreement.

Below are several key negotiation strategies and how to apply them, each with a short how-to and example:

• Right-size your licenses: Don’t renew what you don’t need. Use the data from your internal audit to adjust license quantities and editions to the correct levels. How-to: Before negotiating price, negotiate scope – present Microsoft with a revised bill of materials that drops surplus licenses and switches out expensive SKUs for cheaper ones where appropriate. Make it clear you intend to only pay for active users and necessary features. Example: If you currently have 1,000 Microsoft 365 E5 licenses but only 600 people actively use E5-level features, plan to renew with 600 E5 and 400 downgraded to E3. By removing those 400 unnecessary premium licenses, you save costs upfront – and you can tell Microsoft that this optimization is non-negotiable due to usage data. This pressures them to focus on pricing for the truly needed 600 E5 seats rather than trying to convince you to keep 1,000 at a higher tier.
• Demand higher discounts (and justify them): With built-in volume discounts going away, any price break will come from negotiation, not automatically. Be prepared to ask for aggressive discounts on your most costly items. How-to: Build a business case for why you deserve a better price. Use your benchmark data, highlight the size and longevity of your account, and even mention any pains (budget limits, alternative considerations) to support your request. When you ask for, say, a 15% reduction on the proposed renewal price, do so with justification: “Our analysis shows we’re paying above market. We’re a long-term customer with a significant footprint; we need a 15% improvement to make this viable.” Example: Suppose Microsoft’s initial quote for your Office 365 E3 renewal is $X million/year, which is effectively no discount off list. You might respond that your target is $X minus 10%, backing it up by noting that you know other enterprises got single-digit percentage discounts even after volume tiers ended. By putting a concrete counteroffer on the table with reasoning, you invite Microsoft to come back with a concession instead of just saying “OK” to their first number.
• Use competitive pressure: Microsoft wants to retain and grow your business, especially against cloud competitors. Even if you are deeply invested in Microsoft, don’t be shy about reminding them you have options. How-to: During negotiations, subtly reference that you are evaluating alternatives for certain workloads or licensing models. This can be as gentle as, “We’re also reviewing how AWS or Google might handle some of our needs,” or “We have looked at CSP licensing costs for some parts of our environment.” The idea isn’t to threaten unrealistically, but to signal that you’re not afraid to shift if pushed. Example: If Microsoft is pushing a large Azure consumption commitment, mention that AWS has approached your company with attractive trial credits. This puts Microsoft on notice that a hardline stance could backfire. In turn, they might respond by sweetening the Azure deal (perhaps offering credits of their own or more favorable terms) or by being more flexible on other parts of the EA. Another example on the licensing side: let’s say you qualify to move off EA to a CSP model – even if you prefer EA’s perks, getting a quote from a CSP provider for equivalent licenses gives you a concrete alternative price. You can then ask Microsoft to match or beat that in the EA. The key is to make Microsoft believe (truthfully) that you will consider splitting off parts of the deal or going elsewhere if the terms aren’t right.
• Leverage timing to your advantage: Timing can be one of your biggest negotiation levers. Microsoft’s sales teams have quarterly and annual targets, so when you sign, you can influence their flexibility. How-to: Align your negotiation milestones with Microsoft’s fiscal calendar when possible. Microsoft’s fiscal year ends June 30, and their quarters end in late September, December, March, and June. If your EA expiry is not already near one of those, you might have some flexibility to conclude the deal at a time favorable to you (for example, signing in June or December). Also, start negotiations early enough that you are not pressed for time at the end – you want to be able to walk away or delay if needed, which you can’t if the deadline is tomorrow. Example: Imagine your EA actually expires in October 2025. Starting discussions in early 2025 could allow you to aim for a renewal agreement by June 2025 (Microsoft’s year-end), even if the new term will only start in October. Microsoft, eager to book the renewal in FY25, might offer an extra discount or concession if you’re willing to sign in June. Another timing play: if a new Microsoft product release or price change is looming, use that. In 2025, for instance, knowing that volume discounts end by November, if you can accelerate your renewal to before that date, you might lock in the older pricing model one last time. Conversely, if you pass that date, ensure that Microsoft knows you expect equivalent value through other discounts, as the structure has changed. Otherwise, you might even extend your current agreement a few months as a stopgap (some companies choose a short-term extension to push a renewal into a better timing window).
• Bundle commitments for better terms: Microsoft will be more flexible on pricing if it sees a chance to sell you more. Use this to craft a win-win: you get a better overall deal, and they get a bigger commitment. How-to: Identify if there are any Microsoft products you genuinely plan to adopt in the next term – and consider bringing them into the negotiation. This could involve upgrading some users to a higher tier, adding Dynamics 365, or committing to migrating certain workloads to Azure. Then, leverage that as a bargaining chip: “If we include these additional services or consumption in our EA, we will need improved pricing or extra benefits in return.” Example: Say you’re considering upgrading a department from Office 365 E3 to E5 for better security. Microsoft’s rep will be keen on that upsell. You might agree to add those E5 licenses, but only if Microsoft provides a greater discount across all licenses or gives some free training and support for the new features. Another example: committing to a certain Azure spend over three years – you can negotiate that in exchange, Microsoft provides credits, or discounts on Microsoft 365, or free use of certain management tools. Essentially, you’re trading a broader commitment for a cost concession. The caution here is only bundle what aligns with your goals (don’t agree to “unused” Azure just to get a discount on Office – that defeats the purpose). But when done right, bundling can recoup some of the value lost by the end of volume discounts, and Microsoft will see you as a partner for growth rather than just a cost-sensitive customer.

Each of these strategies can be combined as needed. For instance, your plan might be to right-size and cut 15% of spend, then negotiate a 10% discount on the remaining amount, leverage timing at year-end, and agree to add a moderate Azure commitment to push it over the line.

The overarching theme is to be proactive and assertive: Microsoft’s initial offers will likely favor them (higher cost, more products, and rigid terms). It’s up to you to counter with data-driven requests, create leverage, and reshape the deal to meet your objectives.

6. Incorporating 2025 Trends

Negotiating an EA in 2025 isn’t business as usual. Several new trends and changes this year should directly influence your strategy.

Let’s break down the key 2025-specific factors and how to adjust your playbook accordingly:

– End of Volume Discounts (November 2025): Perhaps the biggest shake-up is Microsoft’s decision to eliminate tiered volume pricing for online services. After November 1, 2025, whether you have 300 seats or 30,000 seats, the default pricing will be the same (essentially the old “Level A” list price). This could result in a significant automatic price increase for many enterprises at renewal. How to handle this? If your EA renewal falls before that date (or you have the opportunity to renew a bit early), strongly consider doing so to lock in the older discount structure for one more term.

That could save a double-digit percentage on your Microsoft 365 or Azure costs over the next three years. If your renewal is after that date, be prepared to negotiate harder on price because Microsoft won’t give you a discount just for being big anymore – you’ll have to ask for it.

Ensure your finance team models the impact: some companies may see a 5-15% cost increase if they simply renew without additional discounts.

Use that data to justify why Microsoft needs to offer concessions (“We’re facing an X% cost increase due to the pricing changes; we need mitigation in this renewal”). Additionally, consider alternative licensing for parts of your environment as a hedge against potential issues.

Some organizations might split off a portion of licenses to a CSP partner who could offer a better rate or monthly flexibility, especially if Microsoft won’t negotiate on the EA pricing. Lastly, communicate internally about this change – nobody likes a surprise budget spike.

By flagging early that “if we do nothing, costs go up due to Microsoft’s policy change,” you can get executive support for a tougher negotiation stance or funds to renew early if that’s viable.

– AI product pushes (Copilot and more): Microsoft in 2025 is heavily promoting its new AI-powered add-ons, notably Microsoft 365 Copilot (an AI assistant across Office apps) and similar offerings in security and development (like GitHub Copilot, etc.). These are exciting, but they come with significant costs (for example, M365 Copilot is approximately $30 per user per month in addition).

The key is to approach AI licensing with caution and on your terms.

Don’t let it be automatically bundled into your EA without scrutiny. Microsoft’s sales teams might try to frame Copilot as the next must-have for everyone, but you should evaluate it objectively: Does it deliver clear value for your business? Maybe only certain roles will benefit (e.g., software developers, data analysts, or content creators might, whereas other roles won’t).

Strategy for Copilot/AI: Insist on a pilot program or trial before any broad purchase. You can negotiate something like, “We’ll take 100 Copilot licenses for 6 months to evaluate, and only roll out further if ROI is proven.” Microsoft may be willing to include a pilot or at least sell a small quantity first – they know enterprises are hesitant.

Also, phase your adoption. Perhaps plan to deploy AI tools in stages (e.g., 10% of users in the first year, another 20% next year if it works out). This can even be written into the EA as an option rather than an obligation.

And if you do decide to adopt, treat these AI products as add-ons with separate terms: negotiate their price separately (try to get a discount or at least a price lock for the term) and ensure you can scale down if they’re not working as expected.

For example, you might negotiate a clause that allows you to drop the Copilot licenses after a year if usage is low or have a renewal checkpoint specifically for that product.

The bottom line is: don’t succumb to the hype. Only commit to AI licenses at the volume and timing that makes sense for you, and use your leverage (Microsoft really wants to sell these) to get favorable conditions if you do.

– Shift to cloud-first commitments:

Microsoft’s strategy is undeniably cloud-first, and you’ll see this reflected in EA negotiations. They may push you to commit to a certain Azure consumption over the term or to move on-prem workloads to cloud services.

They might also be less interested in renewing pure on-premises deals and encourage hybrid arrangements or migrations. To manage this pressure, be clear on your cloud strategy.

If you’re ready and planning to expand Azure use, then great – use that as a negotiating chip as discussed (commit in exchange for discounts or support). But if you’re not ready or you prefer a multi-cloud approach, don’t let Microsoft force an uncomfortable commitment.

Strategies for cloud pressure:

One approach is to negotiate flexibility in cloud commitments. For instance, if Microsoft wants a big Azure spend commitment, you could ask for the ability to adjust it periodically or at least include a clause that if you fall short due to valid reasons, there won’t be punitive penalties (sometimes Microsoft will agree to roll over unused commitment to the next year, for example).

Also, consider a hybrid licensing model as mentioned earlier: keep core stable services under EA and use CSP for variable cloud needs. This way, you’re not putting all your eggs in the three-year commitment basket. If Microsoft sees that you’re willing to allocate only part of your spend in a locked EA and can flex the rest in CSP, they might offer better EA terms to entice you to bring more into EA.

Another trend is Microsoft offering incentives for all-cloud subscriptions (like if you drop on-prem licenses in favor of Microsoft 365, etc.). Weigh those offers carefully – sometimes they come with short-term discounts but long-term lock-in.

Make sure any cloud-driven deal aligns with your IT roadmap. If you do plan to stay mainly with Microsoft for cloud, negotiate for extras: ask for free Azure training credits, architect support, or funding for cloud migration as part of the deal.

In 2025, Microsoft wants customer success stories moving to Azure, so they might be willing to fund some of that. In summary, embrace the cloud where it benefits you, but push back if the commitment is too deep or one-sided.

There’s nothing wrong with telling Microsoft, “We need flexibility to use other clouds or to scale at our pace – how will this agreement accommodate that?”

– Adapting your playbook: Traditional negotiation playbooks assumed a relatively stable pricing scheme and product set. In 2025, adapt by placing greater emphasis on flexibility and risk mitigation.

For example, because pricing could be less predictable (no volume discounts, possible new AI fees), focus on negotiation points like price caps, shorter terms, or mid-term adjustment options more than you might have in the past.

Ensure you discuss and understand Microsoft’s roadmap. If they intend to bundle certain features or change licensing models during your EA term, you want clauses that protect you (no surprise cost increases or forced product swaps).

A concrete adaptation: earlier, you might not have worried about mid-term price hikes, but now you should consider clauses like “if Microsoft raises list prices on a service, our rate stays the same through our term.”

Another example: if historically you always did a 3-year EA, maybe now you entertain a 2-year term if flexibility is more valuable than the slight discount a longer term gives – especially given how fast things (like AI tech and pricing) are evolving.

The point is, question the old assumptions. Every element of the deal – price, term, product inclusion, support, renewal options – should be looked at through the lens of 2025’s dynamic environment.

By incorporating these 2025 trends into your negotiation, you’re proactively addressing the new reality rather than reacting to it.

Microsoft’s sales team will certainly come into the renewal conversation armed with knowledge of these changes (and likely, prepared to upsell or justify higher costs because of them).

You need to be equally prepared to counter those angles: Yes, we know volume discounts are gone, but here’s what we need instead; Yes, we see the value of Copilot, but we will only take it on our terms; Yes, we’re moving to the cloud, but we won’t overcommit without flexibility.

This adaptive mindset will help you navigate the 2025 renewal challenges and still achieve a successful agreement.

7. Strategy Checklist Table

To summarize the best practices, here’s a strategy checklist covering the key steps of a 2025 EA renewal negotiation.

Use this as a reference to ensure you’ve covered all bases:

This checklist provides a high-level overview.

Each step is crucial – skipping the internal audit might mean negotiating with bad information; skipping benchmarking might leave money on the table; skipping strategy execution tactics means you likely accept status quo terms. Following all steps ensures you approach the renewal comprehensively and strategically.

Related articles

• How to Prepare for Your Microsoft EA Renewal – A 12-Month Game Plan
• Building Your Microsoft EA Negotiation Team and Internal Playbook
• Benchmarking Microsoft EA Discounts: Are You Getting a Good Deal?
• Microsoft EA Negotiation Best Practices – A CIO’s Guide (2025 Renewal Edition)
• Microsoft EA Negotiation Playbook 2025–2026 – How to Counter Price Hikes with Optimization, CSP Strategy, and Multi-Cloud Leverage
• Microsoft EA Negotiations
• Mastering Microsoft EA Negotiations: The Ultimate Guide to Enterprise Agreement Renewal

Read about our Microsoft Negotiation Services.

Do you want to know more about our Microsoft Negotiation Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit